City
Epaper

Bench rejects pleas of two disqualified Phulambri corporators

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: May 8, 2021 19:20 IST

Aurangabad, May 8:A petition of two corporators of Phulambri municipal council disqualified by the Aurangabad district collector for ...

Open in App

Aurangabad, May 8:

A petition of two corporators of Phulambri municipal council disqualified by the Aurangabad district collector for illegal construction on the land of Waqf Board was rejected by Justice A J Jamadar of the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court.

Yogesh, son of Phulambri corporator Indubai Madhukar Misal and Santosh Jadhav, husband of Dwarkabai Jadhav, had started an illegal construction on Gut no 353 belonging to the Waqf Board. The Waqf officials then conducted a panchnama. In the application filed by Syed Zulfekhar demanded disqualification of corporators Dwarkabai and Indubai for illegal construction.

Tehsildar of Phulambri issued a notice to the husband and son of the corporators. The Waqf authorities also passed an order to stop the construction. Against this backdrop, the district collector declared both the corporators ineligible. The corporators filed an appeal with the ministry of urban development. But their appeal was rejected. Therefore, they had filed a petition in the Aurangabad bench. Panchnama of the place took place.

The corporators claimed that there are no clear boundaries on the land, hence the illegal construction cannot be ascertained. It was requested that the disqualification order be revoked. On behalf of the complainant, adv Ravindra Gore said that the panchnama was not made before the district collector. Therefore, such an argument cannot be accepted in the writ jurisdiction of the High Court.

The boundaries of illegal construction are mentioned in the pending claims of the Waqf authority. Government prosecutors have also said that the orders of the collector and the urban development minister are legal. While dismissing the petition, the court found that the evidence in the case involved the husband and son of the corporators and others involved in the illegal construction. Therefore, the conclusion cannot be changed in the writ jurisdiction and rejected the petition of the corporators. Adv Gore was assisted by Chandrakant Bodkhe.

Tags: Santosh jadhavDwarkabai jadhavBombay High CourtWaqf BoardJustice of bombay high courtBombay high
Open in App

Related Stories

National‘Question Kunal Kamra In Chennai’: Bombay HC To Police; Grants Protection From Arrest

Navi MumbaiNavi Mumbai: ‘Dog Mafia’ Slur Lands Seawoods Resident in Jail; Bombay HC Orders 7‑Day Term for Contempt

MaharashtraDevendra Fadnavis Summoned by HC in Petition Challenging His 2024 Maharashtra Assembly Poll Win

MumbaiKunal Kamra Controversy: Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection from Arrest to Comedian in Case Over 'Gaddar' Joke

NationalFirst Waqf Notice Hits Villagers After New Law Implementation; ‘Vacate or Pay Tax,’ Sparks Uproar in Tamil Nadu

Aurangabad Realted Stories

AurangabadBJP focuses on building social harmony

AurangabadYoung woman robbed again in Same Area

AurangabadAvoid wild comments on ‘toxic parenting’

AurangabadMumbai-Nagpur high-speed rail project stalls as land acquisition office shut down

AurangabadUDD issues notification of approved City Development Plan