City
Epaper

HC grants relief to 33 residents of Mitmita

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: September 4, 2024 22:20 IST

Lokmat News NetworkChhatrapati Sambhajinagar:The Bombay High Court’s Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyay and Justice Kishor Sant have ...

Open in App

Lokmat News Network

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar:

The Bombay High Court’s Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyay and Justice Kishor Sant have alerted the state government saying if it intends to make changes to the city’s Draft Development Plan, it must issue a notice as per legal provisions. Based on this notice, the 33 petitioners from Gut Number 154 in Mitmitia should be allowed to present their objections and grievances.

The Aurangabad Bench issued this directive because the revised development plan was sent to the government for approval without giving the petitioners a chance to present their views, as required by law.

Residents of Samruddhi Park in Gut Number 154 (Mitmita), including Lata Dabhade and 32 other residents, filed a petition through Advocate Majid S Shaikh. A total of 35 persons purchased 40 gunthas of land in this gut number, developed it and obtained permission from the municipal corporation. However, without notifying the petitioners, the revised draft development plan showed an existing 18-meter (60-foot) internal road running through the petitioners' properties, which was not part of the original plan. When the petitioners raised objections with the municipal corporation, they were informed that the revised plan had already been sent to the government for approval and nothing could be done. Consequently, they filed a petition.

Legal Provision for Amendments to the Development Plan

Under Section 28 (4) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act, while amending or revising the draft development plan, the proposed amendments must be published in the official gazette and at least two local newspapers for public information and invite objections and suggestions regarding the proposed changes from the citizens as per the provisions. Usually, the government approves the amendment without any changes. In this case, personal notices were not issued to the petitioners regarding their objections and suggestions. This amounts to a violation of legal provisions, pointed out the petitioners’ representative Adv Sachin Deshmukh.

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalPakistan: Mahrang Baloch's sister demands Chief Justice's intervention against 'mistreatment' of BYC leaders in prison

International"Deeply saddened by the recent horrific attack in Pahalgam": Thai PM on J-K terror attack

Cricket"You should have (Digvesh) Rathi's confidence in you": LSG's Ravi Bishnoi praises young spinner

InternationalPakistan: Court sentences main accused in Imran Khan attack case to life in prison

InternationalSenior Hamas delegation arrives in Cairo to hold talks with Egyptian officials for ceasefire agreement

Aurangabad Realted Stories

AurangabadFamily booked in another illegal moneylending case

Aurangabad155 wedding guests suffer food poisoning in Kannad tehsil

AurangabadChauka Hill fire under control after 48 hours

AurangabadHC set aside MAT’s order allowing change of caste category

AurangabadRam Navami celebrated at Greenvalley