Anushka Sharma files petition in Bombay HC, challenges Sales Tax Dept's notice for recovery of tax of two years

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: January 12, 2023 15:32 IST2023-01-12T15:30:59+5:302023-01-12T15:32:16+5:30

Actor Anushka Sharma has moved the Bombay High Court challenging two orders passed by the deputy commissioner of Sales ...

Anushka Sharma files petition in Bombay HC, challenges Sales Tax Dept's notice for recovery of tax of two years | Anushka Sharma files petition in Bombay HC, challenges Sales Tax Dept's notice for recovery of tax of two years

Anushka Sharma files petition in Bombay HC, challenges Sales Tax Dept's notice for recovery of tax of two years

Actor Anushka Sharma has moved the Bombay High Court challenging two orders passed by the deputy commissioner of Sales Tax raising dues for 2012-13 and 2013-14 assessment years under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act.

A division bench of Justices Nitin Jamdar and Abhay Ahuja on Thursday directed the sales tax department to respond to her pleas and posted the matter for further hearing on February 6. 

Sharma has sought that the court quash and set aside the orders passed by the Sales Tax department. She has filed four petitions for the assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16. The actor filed the petitions last week after the HC in December 2022 refused to entertain a petition filed by Sharma’s taxation consultant Shrikant Velekar challenging the Sales Tax department orders. 

According to Sharma’s petitions, she performed in films and at award ceremonies as a performer as part of a tri-party agreement with her agent, Yashraj Films Pvt Ltd and producers/event organisers.

The assessing officer levied sales tax not on film consideration but on product endorsements and anchoring at award functions holding that Sharma had transferred her performer’s rights, the pleas said. For 2012-13, the sales tax demand inclusive of interest was Rs 1.2 crore on Rs 12.3 crore consideration and for the year 2013-14, it was Rs 1.6 crore on nearly Rs 17 crore consideration. 

Sharma said an actor who has performed a role in a movie cannot be called a creator or producer of the film and hence does not own copyrights of the film.

“The petitioner submits that as an actor does not possess any copyright in the film, the question of transferring/selling the same to any other person or producer does not arise,” the petitions said.

If as per the Sales Tax department, Sharma has transferred her performer’s rights then it ought to mention to whom she has done so, the pleas said.

“Performer’s rights are to protect the interests of the actor and are not for transfer or sale,” the actor said in her pleas.

 

Open in app