City
Epaper

Emergency duties performed by allopathy doctors, can't be done by Ayurveda physicians: SC

By IANS | Updated: April 26, 2023 22:25 IST

New Delhi, April 26 The Supreme Court on Wednesday set aside a Gujarat High Court order, holding that ...

Open in App

New Delhi, April 26 The Supreme Court on Wednesday set aside a Gujarat High Court order, holding that Ayurveda practitioners working in government hospitals should be treated at par with doctors holding MBBS degrees and they are entitled to equal pay.

A bench of Justices V. Ramasubramanian and Pankaj Mithal said: "Even while recognising the importance of Ayurveda doctors and the need to promote alternative/indigenous systems of medicine, we cannot be oblivious of the fact that both categories of doctors are certainly not performing equal work to be entitled to equal pay."

The bench said it is common knowledge that during out-patient days (OPD) in general hospitals in cities/towns, MBBS doctors are made to attend to hundreds of patients, which is not the case with Ayurveda doctors. "Section 176 of Cr.P.C deals with inquiry by Magistrates into the cause of death. Sub-section (5) of Section 176 uses similar words namely civil surgeon or other qualified medical man. We do not think that the AYUSH doctors are normally notified as competent to perform post-mortem," said the bench.

The top court judgment came on a batch of appeals challenging a 2012 Gujarat High Court order, which held that Ayurveda practitioners are entitled to be treated at par with doctors with MBBS degrees.

The bench said: "By the very nature of the science that they practise and with the advancement of science and modern medical technology, the emergency duty that allopathy doctors are capable of performing and the trauma care that they are capable of providing cannot be performed by Ayurveda doctors."

"It is also not possible for Ayurved doctors to assist surgeons performing complicated surgeries, while MBBS doctors can assist. We shall not be understood to mean as though one system of medicine is superior to the other."

The bench said it is not its mandate nor within its competence to assess the relative merits of these two systems of medical sciences and as a matter of fact, "we are conscious that the history of Ayurveda dates back to several centuries".

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Gujarat High CourtSupreme CourtPankaj mithalSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court levelCanadian supreme courtMaidan metro station
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill

NationalKrishna Janmabhoomi Dispute: Supreme Court to Hear Plea on ASI, Center Involvement In Shahi Eidgah Case April 8

Health Realted Stories

HealthCentre extends financial aid to indigenous indoor air purification solution

HealthChildhood exposure to bacterial toxin can trigger Colorectal cancer among the young: Study

HealthIndia achieves breakthrough in gene therapy for haemophilia: Minister

LifestyleWalking Tips for Summer: Know the Best time to Walk to Avoid Heatstroke

HealthCentre launches campaign to achieve 100 pc Measles-Rubella immunisation coverage