City
Epaper

SC notice on PIL seeking re-opening of 14 lakh Anganwadi centres

By IANS | Updated: September 21, 2020 22:35 IST

New Delhi, Sep 21 The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine a PIL seeking re-opening of around ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Sep 21 The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine a PIL seeking re-opening of around 14 lakh Anganwadi centres, which were shut down due to lockdown to contain the spread of Covid-19.

A bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah issued notice to the Centre as well as the states.

"Issue notice, returnable in four weeks. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to serve a copy of this petition to the office of learned Solicitor General of India," it said.

The plea, filed by Dipika Jagatram Sahani, contended that Anganwadi centres, running under the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) scheme for decades, were closed down using Covid as an excuse.

As a result, the most vulnerable sections of the population suffered malnutrition nation-wide, it said, and sought re-starting of these centres immediately, as the right to food is a right recognised as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution.

"The functioning of all Anganwadis centres in the country came to a sudden halt, poor pregnant mothers, lactating women and children were left in the lurch and had to find ways to get basic food particularly when food was scarce for them even on an ordinary day," said the plea.

The plea claimed if there are no immediate steps to address the supply of food to the vulnerable women and children, then there is a fear of starvation deaths in the country causing irreparable loss.

The plea contended that the ICDS is a flagship programme of the Centre, which not only provides food and nutrition to the beneficiaries which include pregnant women, lactating mothers, adolescent girls besides children below 6 years, nonetheless it provides preschool education, primary health care, nutrition and health information, immunisation, health check-up and referral services to the beneficiaries.

"The Supreme Court has passed a slew of directives in the Writ Petition (Civil) no. 196 of 2001, People's Union for Civil Liberties vs. Union of India and others (PUCL vs. UoI), for protection of right to food of the poor and the underprivileged sections, including children. Several schemes of the Central and state governments have been subject matter of the above petition," said the plea.

The petitioner urged the apex court to issue direction to Centre and all states to forthwith reopen all the Anganwadi centres in the country and provide Anganwadi services as before the lockdown and in accordance with section 4 to 7 of the National Food Security Act, 2013.

The petitioner also sought directions to ensure hot, cooked meals, take-home ration and other provisions for the growth of children.

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: United StatesDipika jagatram sahaniNew DelhiSupreme CourtThe new delhi municipal councilIntegrated child development servicesDelhi south-west
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraOver 10,000 Pakistani Nationals Traced in Maharashtra and Delhi Post-Palgham Terror Attack

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill

Health Realted Stories

HealthTo make health accessible, we must make it affordable: Mansukh Mandaviya

HealthTelangana’s first intestine transplant performed at Osmania Hospital

HealthHimachal takes steps to retain specialist doctors

HealthUganda declares end of Ebola outbreak

HealthScientists find cellular culprit behind age-related abdominal fat