City
Epaper

KP Sharma Oli faces Contempt of Court for making disparaging remarks against lawyers

By ANI | Updated: January 26, 2021 23:00 IST

While the hearing over Nepal's Parliament dissolution will soon be held in the Supreme Court, two cases of Contempt of Court have been registered against caretaker Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli for making disparaging remarks against legal practitioners.

Open in App

While the hearing over Nepal's Parliament dissolution will soon be held in the Supreme Court, two cases of Contempt of Court have been registered against caretaker Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli for making disparaging remarks against legal practitioners.

Two advocates on Tuesday registered the motion against Oli, who now is functioning as the caretaker Prime Minister since the Parliament was dissolved on December 20.

"Two cases of contempt of court have been registered by advocates Kumar Sharma Acharya and Kanchan Krishna Neupane," Devendra Dhakal, Information Officer at the Apex Court confirmed.

The advocates have alleged that Oli tried to influence the court and made disparaging remarks against legal practitioners. In an event on January 22, Oli during his address at a local gathering claimed that the Parliament dissolution has been made over time in Nepali history and there is no provision to restore the lower House.

While defending himself over the issue, Oli took a jibe at a senior advocate and former Chairman of Nepal Bar Association -- Krishna Prasad Bhandari -- by calling him a "grandfather" lawyer and asked petitioners not to trouble him.

He called Bhandari's presence at the Supreme Court as "farce". Bhandari had earlier termed Oli's move to dissolve the Parliament as unconstitutional.

The duo petitioners, who have lodged the case against Oli in the Supreme Court, have claimed that the caretaker Prime Minister has evoked Article 128 (4) of the constitution by making such a disparaging statement. According to the article: "All must abide by any interpretation of the constitution or a law made by or any legal principle laid by the Supreme Court in the course of trying a lawsuit. If anyone makes obstruction in the dispensation of justice by, or disregard any order or judgment handed down by, it or any of its subordinate courts, the Supreme Court may, in accordance with law, initiate proceedings and impose punishment for contempt."

Over a dozen writ petitions have been lodged against Oli over his decision to dissolve the lower House over the fear of failing to get an absolute majority in the Parliament. The verdicts are expected to be announced next month.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Kumar sharma acharyaparliamentKp Sharma OliSupreme CourtK.p sharma oli
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill

NationalKrishna Janmabhoomi Dispute: Supreme Court to Hear Plea on ASI, Center Involvement In Shahi Eidgah Case April 8

International Realted Stories

InternationalFBI arrests Wisconsin judge for allegedly obstructing immigration agents

InternationalSenior Russian General killed in car explosion near Moscow

InternationalIndian Embassy in Germany pays tribute to Pahalgam attack victims

InternationalTerrorists "achieved their objective of killing humanity": UK MP Rami Ranger on Pahalgam attack

International"Pakistan has nurtured terror factory": Indian community holds protest in UK, condemns Pahalgam attack