City
Epaper

'Nature of allegations very serious': SC junks bail plea by alleged ISIS sympathiser

By IANS | Updated: October 20, 2021 17:40 IST

New Delhi, Oct 20 The Supreme Court on Wednesday junked a bail plea by a man, arrested for ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Oct 20 The Supreme Court on Wednesday junked a bail plea by a man, arrested for allegedly collecting funds and recruiting people for international terror organisation ISIS.

A bench headed by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana told petitioner Ubed Mirza's counsel that allegations against his client are very serious.

The bench, also comprising Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli, told senior advocate Siddhartha Dave, representing the petitioner: "There is evidence against you. At this stage, there is no reason for us to discard those evidences. You have been working as ISIS agent."

The bench further added that petitioner's WhatsApp chats pertain to killing people of other religions.

Dave argued that his client, who was a practising advocate in Surat, has been incarcerated for four years without charges having been framed after being arrested by Gujarat Police in 2017. He emphasised that this is in gross violation of his client's fundamental rights.

Counsel submitted that the only allegation against his client was that he was recruiting some people for ISIS for money. It was further argued that Unlawful Activities Prevention Act has been invoked against the petitioner on the basis of Facebook posts and WhatsApp chats. Dave said not a single paise has been recovered from him and also his client never travelled to Syria.

However, the bench clarified it is not saying that bail cannot be granted, as UAPA has been invoked, but the nature of allegations is very serious.

The top court queried Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing Gujarat ATS, over the reason for delay in trial. Mehta submitted it may be due to accused or co-accused had challenged every order passed by the trial court.

After hearing arguments, the bench rejected the petition filed by advocate Farrukh Rasheed on behalf of the accused.

The bench said: "We are not inclined to grant bail. We direct the trial court to complete trial in one year."

The accused was arrested on October 25, 2017. He was allegedly found discussing, advocating ISIS ideology on social media or sharing social media links with another accused, Kasim, who was allegedly planning to carry out a 'lone wolf attack' at a synagogue in Ahmedabad.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Siddhartha daveNew DelhiIsisSuratSupreme CourtHima kohliThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westDiamond cityNew-delhi
Open in App

Related Stories

National‘Harassing Crores for a Few’: Ex-CEC S.Y. Quraishi Criticises SIR Process at Lokmat National Conclave 2025

NationalLokmat National Conclave 2025: Manoj Jha Flags ‘Freebies Culture’, Says Elections Are No Longer Fair

NationalSurat Factory Fire: Massive Blaze Engulfs Chemical Unit in Makhiga Village; Over 10 Fire Tenders Deployed (Watch Video)

NationalGujarat: Massive Fire Broke Out At Godown in Surat's Katargam Area, Firefighting Operation Underway

NationalPregnant Sunali Khatoon and Her Son, Deported as Bangladeshis, to Be Brought Back to India, Centre Tells Supreme Court

International Realted Stories

InternationalBaloch activists commemorate fifth anniversary of Karima Baloch's Death

International"We are losing our land": Sri Lankan MP highlights Tamil community concerns during visit

InternationalChild killed as BNP leader’s house set ablaze amid rising violence in Bangladesh

InternationalUN marks second World Meditation Day with focus on inner peace, global harmony

InternationalPakistan: Baloch National Movement accuses state of targeting families seeking justice for missing persons