City
Epaper

No 'attraction' for Goa: Tushar Mehta quips in HC

By IANS | Updated: August 10, 2021 14:10 IST

Panaji, Aug 10 High on the bucket-lists of domestic tourists as a go-to destination, Goa bodes no "attraction" ...

Open in App

Panaji, Aug 10 High on the bucket-lists of domestic tourists as a go-to destination, Goa bodes no "attraction" for Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, one of the government's top law officers.

Mehta made the disclosure in lighter vein to the Bombay High Court, during a discussion for setting up of a fresh date for the ongoing hearings related to an appeal filed by the Goa government, against the acquittal of former Tehelka editor-in-chief Tarun Tejpal by a trial court in May this year.

While Mehta was seeking to appear before a virtual hearing of the case, Justice Sunil Deshmukh, suggested that the Bombay High Court may be opting for physical hearings in the near future and urged Mehta to visit Goa instead.

"I would definitely like to. But as a tourist, not... I am not busy. First of all, just on the lighter side. Coming from Gujarat I have no attraction in Goa," Mehta said.

"In Gujarat, we are teetotallers and vegetar. Second, I would still like to come to Goa but as a tourist not for work," Mehta also said.

Responding to Mehta's quip, Justice Mahesh Sonak said: "We have legal tourism here".

Mehta's adversary in the Tejpal case, senior advocate Amit Desai, who was also present during the virtual hearing, while responding to Mehta's reluctance to visit Goa, also said: "Mr. Mehta should know that many of his Delhi colleagues have houses in Goa".

The hearing in the case, related to the Goa government's appeal in the rape case, will now be held virtually on August 31.

Tejpal was charged against under sections 376 (rape), 341 (wrongful restraint), 342 (wrongful confinement) 354A (sexual harassment) and 354B (criminal assault), of the Indian Penal Code, after a junior colleague accused him of rape at a five star resort in Goa in 2013.

On May 21, he was acquitted by the trial court in Goa citing "benefit of doubt", following which an appeal was filed by the state government.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Solicitor General of IndiaBombay High CourtTarun TejpalJustice of bombay high courtBombay highSunil deshmukh
Open in App

Related Stories

Navi MumbaiNavi Mumbai: ‘Dog Mafia’ Slur Lands Seawoods Resident in Jail; Bombay HC Orders 7‑Day Term for Contempt

MaharashtraDevendra Fadnavis Summoned by HC in Petition Challenging His 2024 Maharashtra Assembly Poll Win

MumbaiKunal Kamra Controversy: Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection from Arrest to Comedian in Case Over 'Gaddar' Joke

MumbaiBombay HC on Child Adoption: Parents of Two Disabled Children Can Adopt Third Child

Navi MumbaiNavi Mumbai Parking Policy in Final Stage, Proposal to Be Sent for State Govt Approval

International Realted Stories

InternationalNetanyahu to Meloni, top world leaders dial PM Modi to express shock over Pahalgam terror attack

InternationalPolitical tensions growing concern in Bangladesh, says World Bank

International‘Vladimir, stop': Trump says after Russian strikes on Kyiv

InternationalBangladesh: Dhaka police arrests Awami League leaders as support for former PM Hasina grows

InternationalSecurity analyst Sushant Sareen says PM Modi's statement relects Govt's resolve "India wont take Pahalgam attack lying down"