City
Epaper

No further action over Iran sanctions: UN Security Council president

By IANS | Updated: August 26, 2020 08:05 IST

United Nations, Aug 26 The president of the Security Council said that he will not take any action ...

Open in App

United Nations, Aug 26 The president of the Security Council said that he will not take any action on a purported US notification for a "snapback" mechanism on sanctions against Iran.

Indonesia's UN ambassador Dian Tryah Djani, whose country holds the Security Council presidency for the month of August, on Tuesday said he "is not in the position" to take further action as there is no consensus among council members over the issue, Xinhua news agency reported.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Thursday submitted Washington's demand for the return of all pre-2015 UN sanctions against Iran. But the overwhelming majority of Security Council members hold that the US move does not constitute a "notification" as envisaged in Security Council Resolution 2231, which endorsed the Iran nuclear deal.

They argued that the United States has no right to invoke the "snapback" mechanism as it is no longer a participant since it withdrew from the deal in May 2018.

Asked on Tuesday by Russia and China on how he would proceed with the US demand, Djani said: "It is clear for me that there is one (council) member which has a particular position on the issue while there are a significant number of members who have contesting views. In my view, there is no consensus in the council. Thus, the president is not in the position to take further action."

Under Resolution 2231, any participant state to the Iran nuclear deal can notify the Security Council about an issue that it considers a significant violation of the agreement. The UN sanctions in place before the adoption of Resolution 2231 in July 2015 would then resume 30 days after the notification, unless the Security Council adopts a resolution to decide otherwise.

Under the resolution, if no member of the Security Council has submitted a draft resolution to prevent a snapback within 10 days of a notification by a participant state, the president of the Security Council shall submit such a draft resolution and put it to a vote within 30 days of the notification.

All remaining participant states of the deal except Iran Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia were on the Security Council. The E3 Britain, France and Germany on Tuesday reiterated their common position that the United States is not eligible to invoke the "snapback" mechanism as it has withdrawn from the deal.

Russia's UN ambassador Vassily Nebenzia asked the United States to stop pursuing its path, which, he said, "is not only illegal but simply will not lead to achieving the result that was envisaged by the United States."

He also commended Indonesia's conclusion that no further action shall be taken in the Security Council.

Zhang Jun, China's permanent representative to the United Nations, said participants of the Iran nuclear deal and the overwhelming majority of Security Council members believe that the US demand for restoring UN sanctions on Iran has no legal ground and goes against common views, and the "snapback" mechanism shall not be deemed as invoked.

China resolutely opposes the U.S. demand and holds the view that the US letter submitted on Thursday should not be identified as "notification" specified in Security Council Resolution 2231, he said.

"The council should fully respect views of the international community and the overwhelming majority of council members, uphold its credibility and authority, and fulfill its responsibility of maintaining international peace and security," he said.

The US permanent representative to the United Nations, Kelly Craft, remained adamant on Tuesday despite the isolation.

"Let me just make it really, really clear: the Trump administration has no fear in standing in limited company on this matter, in light of the unmistakable truth guiding our actions," she told the Security Council.

She said other members of the Security Council "have lost their way."

The US move on Thursday came after its draft resolution that sought to extend the current arms embargo against Iran failed in the Security Council. In a voting on Aug. 14, only the United States itself and the Dominican Republic voted in favour.

Under Resolution 2231, the arms embargo against Iran expires on October 18, 2020.

The US move to invoke the "snapback" mechanism seeks to automatically bring back all pre-2015 sanctions, including the arms embargo.

Once a "snapback" is initiated, the United States could use its veto power in the Security Council to shoot down any draft resolution that seeks to prevent the restoration of the sanctions against Iran.

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalUkraine's frontline situation remains difficult, Zelenskyy calls for "more tangible pressure on Russia"

CricketMumbai Indians complete 150 wins in history of Indian Premier League

InternationalThousands of Pakistani pilgrims to miss out on Hajj 2025 due to limited quota

CricketZaheer Khan stats LSG will stick to the plan that NCA has developed for Mayank

Cricket"Bowlers did a great job": RCB skipper Rajat Patidar after registering win over Delhi Capitals

International Realted Stories

InternationalUkraine offers condolences to Canada after "heartbreaking" Vancouver festival tragedy

InternationalCanada goes to polls on April 28

InternationalOman, UAE boost bilateral trade, investment ties at Advantage Oman Forum

InternationalDubai Municipality to highlight its pioneering tourism projects at Arabian Travel Market 2025

InternationalIndian diaspora in Frankfurt holds protest against J-K terror attack