City
Epaper

SC reserves verdict on Amazon's pleas challenging Future-Reliancedeal

By IANS | Updated: July 29, 2021 16:05 IST

New Delhi, July 29 The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved the judgment on the pleas of e-commerce giant ...

Open in App

New Delhi, July 29 The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved the judgment on the pleas of e-commerce giant Amazon challenging the Rs 24,713 crore deal for merger of Future Retail Ltd (FRL) with Reliance Retail.

Senior advocates Harish Salve and Gopal Subramanium, appearing for FRL and Amazon respectively, concluded their submissions in the case today.

A bench comprising justices R.F. Nariman and B.R. Gavai said it will close the arguments in the matter. "The judgment is reserved", said the bench.

Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC and FRL have been locked in a better legal battle over the deal. Amazon had argued that the Singapore's Emergency Arbitrator (EA) award, which restrained FRL from going ahead with the merger, was valid and enforceable. Amazon had moved the apex court challenging the Delhi High Court's division bench order which gave a green signal to the Reliance-FRL deal.

Salve, representing FRL, contended there was no notion of EA under the Indian law on arbitration and conciliation and also, there was no arbitration agreement to this effect. He emphasized that there was no provision for EA under the Indian law.

On February 8, the division bench had stayed the single-judge direction to FRL and various statutory authorities to maintain the status quo on the deal.

Amazon submitted in the top court that Biyanis of Future Group had negotiated with it to enter into certain agreements and emphasized that EA's award was enforceable. The e-commerce giant insisted FRL is bound by Singapore's EA award, which restrained it from going ahead with its merger deal with Reliance Retail.

The high court division bench passed an interim direction on FRL's appeal challenging the February 2 order of the single judge which had ruled in favour of the US firm. The single judge bench had said the EA's award was valid and enforceable.

The Future group, in August last year, had reached an agreement to sell its retail, wholesale, logistics, and warehousing units to Reliance.

Subsequently, Amazon took FRL into EA before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) over alleged breach of contract by the Future group and also filed a plea at the high court seeking enforcement of the October 25, 2020, EA award by SIAC restraining FRL from going ahead with the deal with Reliance Retail.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: amazonsingaporeNew DelhiSupreme CourtHarish SalveThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-west
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSexually Explicit Content on OTT, Social Media: Supreme Court Issues Notice to Centre

MaharashtraOver 10,000 Pakistani Nationals Traced in Maharashtra and Delhi Post-Palgham Terror Attack

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

EntertainmentOTT Releases This Week: Khauf, Mere Husband Ki Biwi, Logout, Daveed & More – Top Picks for Your Weekend Watchlist

International Realted Stories

InternationalSouth Africa records eight per cent increase in cross-border travellers during Easter

InternationalSpain, Portugal hit by major power outage

International"Unsecured border on purpose": US Border Czar slams Biden over border security

InternationalIranian, Saudi FMs hold phone talks over bilateral ties, regional developments

InternationalIsrael rejects proposal for five-year truce with Hamas: State media