City
Epaper

Chandrakant Patil: Maratha reservation movement was cooled down & killed down by Thackeray govt

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: May 5, 2021 12:32 IST

It is a failure of the state government that the Maratha reservation could not survive in the Supreme Court. ...

Open in App

It is a failure of the state government that the Maratha reservation could not survive in the Supreme Court. In 2018, the then Devendra Fadnavis-led government in Maharashtra had approved 16% reservation for the Marathas in jobs and education after statewide protests. While hearing petitions against the move in 2019, the Bombay High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the law, but stated that 16% reservation was not justifiable. It directed the state government to reduce the quota to 12%-13% as per the recommendations of the State Backward Classes Commission.

The Maha Vikas Aghadi government has not been able to convince the Supreme Court why the Maratha community needs more than 50 per cent reservation. Because of this, I protest against the government, said Chandrakant Patil. Patil has said that the youth of the Maratha community should come together and ask the state government for an answer.

The Maratha reservation movement was cooled down and killed down. The Supreme Court did not keep the case pending, it just passed the vedict. This ended the hope of reservation. Fadnavis formed a backward commission, got consent in the assembly, got reservation in the high court. The current government created mess just like it has with the covid situation now. There was a lack of coordination, said Patil. Patil has alleged that Maha Vikas Aghadi government is in the forefront of repealing the law passed by Fadnavis.

The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday has struck down the reservation for Maratha community in education/ jobs exceeding 50%.

A five-judge Constitution Bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, L Nageswara Rao, S Abdul Nazeer, Hemant Gupta and Ravindra Bhat while pronouncing the judgment said that there was no valid ground to breach 50% reservation while granting Maratha reservation.

Justice Bhushan, reading out the judgment said, we do not find any reason in revisiting Indira Sawhney judgment. Justice Bhushan said that with respect to Article 342-A, we have upheld the Constitutional Amendment and it does not violate any Constitutional provision and therefore, we have dismissed the writ petition challenging the Maratha Reservation.

SC also made it clear in its judgement that people from the Maratha community cannot be declared as educationally and socially backward community to bring them within the reserved category 

Tags: Chandrakant PatilSupreme CourtDevendra FadnavisMaha Vikas AghadiMaratha ReservationMaratha Community
Open in App

Related Stories

NashikSimhastha Authority to Be Established in Nashik: Eknath Shinde Unveils Plans in Mumbai Meeting

MumbaiNavi Mumbai International Airport Will Be Country's First to Have Water Taxi Services, Says CM Devendra Fadnavis

MaharashtraPahalgam Terror Attack: 500 Tourists from Maharashtra Return Home in Two Days; State Government Arranges Special Flights (VIDEO)

MaharashtraPahalgam Terror Attack: Maharashtra Govt Announces Rs 5 Lakh Ex-Gratia for Each Deceased's Family; Rs 50,000 for Injured

NationalPahalgam Terrorist Attack: ‘I Am Alive, My Namesake Was Killed’ Says Sangli Juice Seller Who Escaped the Spot by an Hour

Maharashtra Realted Stories

MumbaiMumbai: Three Arrested for Assaulting Police at Checkpoint in Pydhonie

MumbaiMumbai: Security Beefed Up at Major Railway Stations, Including CSMT

PunePune Tourist Captures Suspected Terrorists on Mobile Days Before Pahalgam Attack, Submits Video to NIA

Mumbai107 Pakistani Nationals Missing Across Maharashtra, Police Launch Statewide Search

MaharashtraMaharashtra Couple Arrives in Pahalgam, Celebrates Wedding Anniversary Days After Terror Attack