City
Epaper

Delhi court to decide on closure of POCSO case against Brij Bhushan on March 2

By IANS | Updated: January 11, 2024 18:15 IST

New Delhi, Jan 11 A Delhi court on Thursday deferred pronouncement of order on whether to accept Delhi ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 11 A Delhi court on Thursday deferred pronouncement of order on whether to accept Delhi Police’s cancellation report for a sexual harassment case lodged by a minor wrestler against former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief and BJP MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh to March 2.

Additional Sessions Judge Chhavi Kapoor (ASJ) of Patiala House Courts said that some clarifications were required in the matter.

The police's cancellation report was filed on June 15, 2023, and was not opposed by the complainant during the last hearing.

On August 1, 2023, the alleged victim and her father had expressed their satisfaction with the police investigation, raising no objection to the police's report in the case.

They had recorded their statement in an in-chamber proceeding before ASJ Kapoor.

On July 4 last year, the court had sought the complainant's response to the police's cancellation report. The 550-page report filed by the police before the Patiala House Courts had said that no corroborative evidence was found in the allegations levelled by the minor.

"In the POCSO matter, after completion of investigation, we have submitted a report under Section 173 of CrPC requesting for cancellation of the case based upon the statements of the complainant, i.e., the father of the victim and the victim herself," Delhi Police had said.

The FIR on the accusations levelled by the minor was filed under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, along with relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) concerning the act of outraging modesty.

However, the father of the minor wrestler had stepped forward later and claimed that he filed a "false" complaint of sexual harassment against Brij Bhushan.

The father alleged that his actions were driven by anger and frustration over the WFI chief's perceived biased treatment towards his daughter.

A second statement of the minor under Section 164 of CrPC was recorded in the court on June 5 in which she did not allege sexual harassment by Brij Bhushan, as per sources.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

CricketTammy Beaumont eyes One-Day Cup success to regain England spot

EntertainmentPankaj Tripathi opens up about collaborating once again with director Amit Rai on a human drama

NationalKashmir mourns massacre of civilians with bandh; 2 locals, 2 foreigners among 16 killed by terrorists

NationalPahalgam Terror Attack Aftermath: Special Flights Deployed as Tourists Rush to Exit Kashmir

BusinessLa Excellence IAS Academy Celebrates Stellar Performance with 78+ Rankers in UPSC 2024

National Realted Stories

NationalPrivate sector subscribers under NPS cross over 12 lakh in FY25

NationalPahalgam terror attack: Nirmala Sitharaman cuts short US-Peru visit

NationalIndian Army foils infiltration bid in Uri LoC; ops underway

NationalPahalgam Terror Horror: Tourists Gunned Down in Baisran Valley, Survivors Recount Chilling Ordeal

NationalPahalgam terror attack: Civil Aviation Minister announces four additional flights from Srinagar