City
Epaper

Delhi HC asks Centre to reply on plea challenging appointment of president of medical assesement, rating board for NCISM

By ANI | Updated: September 28, 2021 14:45 IST

The Delhi High Court has asked the Centre and others to file a reply on plea challenging the appointment of the president of the medical assessment and rating board for the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (NCISM).

Open in App

The Delhi High Court has asked the Centre and others to file a reply on plea challenging the appointment of the president of the medical assessment and rating board for the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (NCISM).

The petitioner has sought to call the entire record of the selection process of the President of the accreditation Board of the NCISM under the impugned notification dated June 9, 2021.

A Division Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh asked the Centre, NCISM and others to file a reply on the plea and listed the matter for November 28 for further hearing.

The Court was hearing a petition filed by Raghunandan Sharma through advocate Ashok Kumar Panigarhi and Gautam Kumar Laha.

Sharma, an ayurvedic doctor and former President of erstwhile CCIM, has challenged the appointment of Raghuram Bhatt as the President of the medical assessment and rating board for the Indian system of Medicine.

The Medical Assessment and Rating Board for the Indian system of Medicine constitutes of a President and eight members and the board is responsible to keep the standard of Medical Education in the Indian system of medicine.

The petitioner claimed that Bhatt despite having not any administrative experience in any premier private, semi govt or govt sector, has been selected as President of the Medical Assessment and Rating Board for the Indian system of Medicine of the newly established National Commission.

"By this, an incompetent person has been given the responsibility to control the entire AYUSH education of this country and abroad as a President of the Medical Assessment and Rating Board. As such, the verythe selection process is under cloud with respect to its competency," the petitioner said.

He called the entire selection biased and arbitrary and tainted with prior collusion in the absence of transparency.

The petitioner has sought to quash the appointment of the Respondent number 3 (Bhatt) being a disqualified candidate as per the prescribed qualification under the relevant act.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: National commission for indian system of medicineRaghunandan sharmaDelhi High CourtJyoti SinghDelhi delhi high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalRCB Approaches Delhi High Court Against Uber Over Advertisement Featuring Travis Head

NationalSupreme Court Judges Unanimously Agreed To Declare Their Assets

NationalDelhi High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma Transfer to Allahabad HC Amid Cash Recovery Controversy

NationalHC Directs Centre to Decide on Renaming India to Bharat or Hindustan

Other SportsDelhi High Court Grants Bail To Olympic Medallist Sushil Kumar In Murder Case

National Realted Stories

NationalRozgar Mela: Excited new recruits in J&K thank PM Modi

NationalHimachal farmers promoting cow dung, buttermilk for natural farming in mountainous terrain

NationalViksit Bharat will be driven by start-ups and innovation: IIT Madras Director

NationalPahalgam aftermath: Crackdown intensifies in Kashmir, 175 detained

NationalBengaluru Namma Metro Update: Services to Start Early on Sunday for TCS World 10K Run; Check Timings & Other Details