City
Epaper

Delhi HC directs Google to suspend misleading Starbucks Franchise Google Forms

By IANS | Updated: January 24, 2024 12:25 IST

New Delhi, Jan 24 The Delhi High Court has issued a directive asking Google to suspend URLs associated ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 24 The Delhi High Court has issued a directive asking Google to suspend URLs associated with various Google Forms inviting the public to apply for a 'Starbucks Franchise'.

Justice Anish Dayal said that Starbucks, which has filed the suit, is authorised to file an affidavit listing similar URLs of Google Forms. Google is then expected to suspend those URLs upon receiving the information.

Starbucks, which has gone against unidentified entities falsely claiming to be its franchisees, reiterated that an interim injunction had been granted in favour of Starbucks in April of the previous year.

The fresh application aims to restrain impostors who were posing as 'Starbucks Franchise' through Google Forms.

Notably, Starbucks, the multinational coffeehouse chain, does not operate on a franchise model in India.

"Counsel for the plaintiffs, therefore, states that the imposters are seeking information from general public to apply for Starbucks Franchise opportunities, which as noted above does not exist in India," the court noted.

These fraudulent forms, with headings such as 'StarBucks franchise', misled individuals into believing they could apply for Starbucks franchises in India.

The court affirmed Starbucks' entitlement to relief, citing concerns about the misuse of Google Forms by impostors to gather information related to a nonexistent Starbucks franchise in India.

Additionally, the court stressed the impropriety of seeking private information and data from the general public through such deceptive means.

It noted: "In the opinion of this Court, the plaintiffs would be entitled to the relief they seek in this application, on account of not only that these Google Forms are being posted by imposters in order to elicit information relating to Starbucks franchise (which do not exist in India) as well as seeking private information and data from the general public, which cannot be countenanced."

Justice Dayal concluded that if Google has reservations about specific URLs, they can respond to Starbucks, and if necessary, approach the court for further adjudication and relief.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalSenior Hamas delegation arrives in Cairo to hold talks with Egyptian officials for ceasefire agreement

MumbaiMumbai: BTech Student Among Three Held for Duping Trader of Rs 15 Lakh

NationalPoster controversy: Police disperse protestors in Jaipur, say situation under control

NationalGujarat: Vadodara woman duped of Rs 5.61 lakh in visa scam, complaint filed

NationalRetaliatory actions against Pak reflect India’s strong policy against those promoting terror: Raksha Khadse

National Realted Stories

NationalMP: CM holds meeting on law and order, identified 228 Pak citizens to leave nation by Sunday

NationalRoad rage case: K’taka HC restrains police from initiating coercive action against IAF wing commander

NationalBihar: Senior IAS officer KK Pathak relieved, set to join Central govt

NationalInimical forces may spread false propaganda to disturb peace: Nagaland Police

NationalMadhya Pradesh: Three children drown in dam