City
Epaper

Delhi HC refers dispute between BharatPe, Ashneer Grover to arbitration

By IANS | Updated: August 22, 2024 14:25 IST

New Delhi, Aug 22 The Delhi High Court on Thursday referred a dispute between BharatPe, an online money ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 22 The Delhi High Court on Thursday referred a dispute between BharatPe, an online money transaction platform, and its former managing director Ashneer Grover to a sole arbitrator.

In its plea filed before the Delhi High Court, the fintech company alleged that Grover disclosed confidential information relating to BharatPe on social media platforms, in violation of the employment agreement.

Before the issue reached Delhi HC, responding to BharatPe’s notice to refer the matter to arbitration, Grover agreed on the formation of an arbitral tribunal but disagreed on the name of sole arbitrator.

In an earlier round of litigation, the Delhi High Court imposed a fine of Rs 2 lakh on Grover over blatant violation of earlier orders and assurances made by him to not post on social media defamatory posts against BharatPe.

It had asked Ashneer Grover as well as the officials of the fintech company not to speak in a "unparliamentary" or "defamatory" manner against one another.

The Delhi High Court issued an order restraining Grover from making defamatory and derogatory statements against BharatPe, its office bearers, or officials, and asked Grover to remove his posts, including one calling the SBI Chairperson "petty".

Ashneer and his wife allegedly committed financial irregularities when they were at the helm of the fintech platform.

BharatPe terminated the services of Madhuri Jain, head of controls, after an internal probe found misappropriation of funds that ran into crores during her tenure.

The fintech platform claimed that Grover, his wife, and their relatives were engaged in extensive misappropriation of company funds and grossly abused company money to fund their lavish lifestyles.

Grover had already moved an arbitration plea with the Singapore International Arbitration Centre pleading that the investigation launched against him was illegal because it violated the shareholder agreement and articles of association.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

TechnologyIDFC FIRST Bank posts nearly 60 pc net profit loss at Rs 295.6 crore in Q4 FY25

Other SportsAsia Pacific Rally Championship: Karna Kadur and Musa Sherif top the leaderboard after Day 2

InternationalHouse Committee subpoenas Chinese telecom firms over suspected CCP, military ties

BusinessIDFC FIRST Bank posts nearly 60 pc net profit loss at Rs 295.6 crore in Q4 FY25

BusinessMaharashtra Governor C. P. Radhakrishnan applauds YMCA's legacy of transforming lives

National Realted Stories

NationalKarnataka: ED seizes cash valued at Rs 2.25 crore from woman's residence

NationalUP's health sector to play key role in achieving state's $1 trillion economy vision

NationalFarrukhnagar to see major development in next five years: Haryana Minister

NationalMinister Ashish Sood outlines plan to make Delhi a 'credible medical destination'

National'Prepared to give befitting reply to Pak-based terror groups as reiterated by PM Modi': Top BSF official