City
Epaper

Delhi HC to hear on Aug 28 plea challenging PMO's decision to deny RTI on PM-CARES Fund

By ANI | Updated: June 10, 2020 20:15 IST

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday said that it will hear on August 28 a plea challenging a decision of the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), Prime Minister's Office (PMO), wherein an RTI application seeking documents related to the PM-CARES Fund was denied.

Open in App

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday said that it will hear on August 28 a plea challenging a decision of the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), Prime Minister's Office (PMO), wherein an RTI application seeking documents related to the PM-CARES Fund was denied.

The PMO has raised questions on the maintainability to the petition challenging the decision of its CPIO. Thereafter, Justice Navin Chawla listed the matter for August 28 for further argument.

The plea, filed by one Samyak Gangwal, through advocates Debopriyo Moulik and Ayush Shrivastava, said that the CPIO refused to provide the documents sought by the petitioner on grounds that the Prime Minister's Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations (PM-CARES) Fund is not a 'Public Authority' as defined in the RTI Act, 2005.

He said that a public charitable trust named PM-CARES Fund was a measure to combat the COVID-19 pandemic by the PMO on March 28 through a press note.

In the press release, the PMO appealed to the citizens of our country to generously donate to the PM-CARES Fund in light of severe health and economic ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic.

It was also announced that donations to PM-CARES fund would qualify as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and would be exempted from tax under Section 10 and Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the plea said.

It said that on May 1, the petitioner exercising his Right to Information and filed an online RTI seeking the information about the PM-CARES Fund.

Meanwhile, another public interest litigation (PIL) seeking transparency on PM-CARES Fund was withdrawn. The PIL, being heard by a division bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan, was dismissed as withdrawn.

The PIL filed by one SS Hooda, through advocate Aditya Hooda, sought transparency of PM-CARES Fund and to display details of money received and for which purposes the amount was used in its website.

In the plea, Hooda said that anybody that is owned, controlled or substantially financed by the government qualifies a public authority under the RTI Act. He said that the government controls as well as substantially financed the PM-CARES Fund.

According to the plea, COVID-19 patients have a right to know about the funds.

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: Central public information officerDebopriyo moulikDelhi High CourtNavin ChawlaDelhi delhi high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalRCB Approaches Delhi High Court Against Uber Over Advertisement Featuring Travis Head

NationalSupreme Court Judges Unanimously Agreed To Declare Their Assets

NationalDelhi High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma Transfer to Allahabad HC Amid Cash Recovery Controversy

NationalHC Directs Centre to Decide on Renaming India to Bharat or Hindustan

Other SportsDelhi High Court Grants Bail To Olympic Medallist Sushil Kumar In Murder Case

National Realted Stories

NationalKarnataka BJP MLA's 'violent' remarks against Robert Vadra trigger row

NationalIAF confirms object falling from sky on MP house as 'non-explosive store'; probe initiated

NationalRahul Gandhi, Congress should apologise for derogatory remarks against Savarkar: BJP's Ram Kadam

NationalTripura CM Saha holds key meeting with BJP, IPFT and TMP leaders

NationalPahalgam terror attack: Rajkot airport goes 24/7 as Pak shuts airspace for Indian flights