City
Epaper

Each individual in J-K was waiting for this decision: Ghulam Nabi Azad on SC order over reviewing of restrictive orders

By ANI | Updated: January 10, 2020 14:45 IST

After the Supreme Court on Friday directed the Jammu and Kashmir administration to review the restrictive orders imposed in the Union Territory within a week, senior Congress Ghulam Nabi Azad said that each individual in the region was waiting for the decision.

Open in App

After the Supreme Court on Friday directed the Jammu and Kashmir administration to review the restrictive orders imposed in the Union Territory within a week, senior Congress Ghulam Nabi Azad said that each individual in the region was waiting for the decision.

"Each individual in Jammu and Kashmir was waiting for this decision. Supreme Court has made it clear to the government that they should publish all the orders passed since August 5, 2019. The court has also said that any order on internet comes under judicial scrutiny," Azad said.

The top court while hearing the petitions challenging restrictions in Jammu and Kashmir stated that the right to access the internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution of India.

"It is no doubt that freedom of speech is an essential tool in a democratic setup. The freedom of Internet access is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution," a two-judge bench headed by Justice N V Ramana stated while reading out the judgment.

The top court said that Kashmir has seen a lot of violence and that it will try to maintain a balance between human rights and freedoms with the issue of security.

It also directed the Jammu and Kashmir administration to review the restrictive orders imposed in the region within a week. "The citizens should be provided highest security and liberty,' the apex court said.

The top court made observations and issued directions while pronouncing the verdict on a number of petitions challenging the restrictions and internet blockade imposed in Jammu and Kashmir after the abrogation of Article 370 in August last year.

The Supreme Court had on November 27 reserved the judgment on a batch of petitions challenging restrictions imposed on communication, media and telephone services in Jammu and Kashmir pursuant to revocation of Article 370.

The court heard the petitions filed by various petitioners including Ghulam Nabi Azad and Kashmir Times editor Anuradha Bhasin.

The petitions were filed after the central government scrapped Article 370 in August and bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories -- Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Following this, phone lines and the internet were blocked in the region. The government had, however, contended that it has progressively eased restrictions.

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: kashmirjammuSupreme CourtGhulam Nabi AzadThe Supreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalPahalgam Terror Attack: Social Activist Shot, Injured in North Kashmir Amid Valley Tensions

MaharashtraPahalgam Terror Attack: ‘The Biggest Responsibility Is To Bring Every Indian Home Safely’, Says Supriya Sule

MaharashtraPahalgam Terror Attack: Mortal Remains of 6 Maharashtra Tourists to Be Flown Home, Minister Girish Mahajan Leaves For Srinagar

NationalPahalgam Terror Horror: Tourists Gunned Down in Baisran Valley, Survivors Recount Chilling Ordeal (Watch video)

NationalPahalgam Terror Attack Aftermath: Special Flights Deployed as Tourists Rush to Exit Kashmir

National Realted Stories

NationalFive Bangladeshi nationals pushed back for illegal infiltration: Assam CM

National‘Not just half an hour, but Pakistan is half a century behind India’: Owaisi

NationalWords of PM Modi resonate with spirit of seva and nation-building: Tripura CM Saha

National19 people arrested for ‘pro-Pakistan’ stand: Assam CM

NationalSecurity forces kill three NSCN (KYA) militants in Arunachal; rescue construction worker