City
Epaper

Kerala HC stays criminal proceedings against Ramdev, Balkrishna

By IANS | Updated: April 3, 2025 15:26 IST

Kochi, April 3 The Kerala High Court on Thursday stayed criminal proceedings against Patanjali Ayurved's promoters, Baba Ramdev ...

Open in App

Kochi, April 3 The Kerala High Court on Thursday stayed criminal proceedings against Patanjali Ayurved's promoters, Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna, in the misleading advertisement case.

A single judge bench of Justice V G Arun stayed the proceedings pending before the district court in Palakkad for three months.

The prosecution against Patanjali and its promoters was instituted based on a complaint filed by the Palakkad Drug Inspector, alleging that they shared a misleading advertisement for a product, 'Mukta Vati Extra Power', on September 30, 2023.

The complainant alleged that the 'Mukta Vati Extra Power' advertisement violated the provisions of the Drugs and Magical Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act, 1954.

The petitioner further alleged that the advertisement was published in a newspaper to induce patients to purchase the drugs, which will result in self-medication and use of the drug without the direction of a medical practitioner, leading to undesirable and irreparable effects on the health of persons.

Later, an inspection was conducted in the premises of Patanjali, and the drug was found stocked in the premises for sale.

As per the complaint, "It was a drug as defined under Section 2(b) of the Act and that the label of the product contained 'Indications- Useful in Blood Pressure (Cardiac Disorder)', which is alleged to be an advertisement within the meaning of Section 2(a) of the Act."

After that, Ramdev and Balkrishna approached the High Court seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings against them.

In their plea, they further pointed out, "The word magic remedy is defined as a drug having miraculous powers. The object of section 3(d) is to suggest/calculate to lead the use of the drug, such as a magical remedy is not advertised."

"The advertisement says that the medicine can be used only after a prescription by a registered medical practitioner, which means that it does not lead to the drug's use straightaway. So, the offence under section 3(d) is not made out," they claimed.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalTerrorists "achieved their objective of killing humanity": UK MP Rami Ranger on Pahalgam attack

International"Pakistan has nurtured terror factory": Indian community holds protest in UK, condemns Pahalgam attack

CricketSourav Ganguly calls for breaking India's cricketing ties with Pakistan following Pahalgam terror attack

MumbaiMumbai Local Train Update: Western Railway Announces 35-Hour Mega Block Between Kandivali and Borivali on April 26–27 – Details Inside

CricketSRH skipper Cummins hails "clinical" bowling performance after win over CSK

National Realted Stories

NationalKarnataka BJP MLA's 'violent' remarks against Robert Vadra trigger row

NationalIAF confirms object falling from sky on MP house as 'non-explosive store'; probe initiated

NationalRahul Gandhi, Congress should apologise for derogatory remarks against Savarkar: BJP's Ram Kadam

NationalTripura CM Saha holds key meeting with BJP, IPFT and TMP leaders

NationalPahalgam terror attack: Rajkot airport goes 24/7 as Pak shuts airspace for Indian flights