City
Epaper

Kerala: M Sivasankar approaches Central Administrative Tribunal against Govt's suspension order

By ANI | Updated: October 28, 2022 12:00 IST

Former principal secretary to the Kerala Chief Minister, M Sivasankar, approached the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) challenging the order ...

Open in App

Former principal secretary to the Kerala Chief Minister, M Sivasankar, approached the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) challenging the order of the State Government which suspended him from service from July 17, 2020. The suspension is regarding his alleged involvement in the Kerala Gold Smuggling Case.

He sought the Tribunal for a directive to the State Government to expedite and finalise the disciplinary proceedings which were already initiated against him before his retirement.

M Sivasankar will retire on January 31, 2023.

Tribunal sent notice to the Chief Secretary and Public Administration Secretary of Kerala on this.

He also sought to count the period of illegal suspension of him (from July 17, 2020 to January 4, 2022) as a duty period and also contended that the entire disciplinary proceedings were illegal and liable to be set aside.

"The State government has failed to consider the petitioner's statements of defence and to take a call on whether to proceed further with the disciplinary proceedings or not. Petitioner had a right to a speedy conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him. Despite having gone on leave, the state government cancelled the leave and placed him under suspension from July 17, 2020," he contended.

The state government took these decisions purely on extraneous considerations and for political reasons. The media trial outside was strong enough to compel the government to place an innocent officer under suspension in order to quell the vitiated uproar of the media.

The suspension orders referred to a report dated July 16, 2020, submitted by a committee comprising the Chief Secretary and Additional Chief Secretary (Finance). However, the report had never been furnished to him. It was seemingly issued without a due and proper inquiry and it was riddled with factual inaccuracies.

Therefore, the suspension orders were in direct violation of rule 7(b) of the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. The proviso to Rule 3 of the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969, mandates that disciplinary proceedings ought to be laid before the expiry of 30 days from the date of the suspension order issued in contemplation of disciplinary proceedings.

Presently, he is serving as the principal secretary in the Sports and Youth Affairs, Government of Kerala.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Central administrative tribunalTribunal
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalUPSC Exam: Delhi HC asks CAT to promtly decide plea for CSAT cutoff reduction

AurangabadFamily members of accident victim get Rs 28.25 L compensation

PoliticsSomesh Kumar assumes office as Chief Advisor to Telangana CM

National"Ring-fenced amount of Rs 200 cr be set apart for waste management": Uttrakhand Govt to NGT

BusinessLevel of passengers' travel has now surpassed pre-Covid levels, says Ministry of Civil Aviation official

National Realted Stories

NationalPoster controversy: Police disperse protestors in Jaipur, say situation under control

NationalGujarat: Vadodara woman duped of Rs 5.61 lakh in visa scam, complaint filed

NationalRetaliatory actions against Pak reflect India’s strong policy against those promoting terror: Raksha Khadse

NationalMP: CM holds meeting on law and order, identified 228 Pak citizens to leave nation by Sunday

NationalRoad rage case: K’taka HC restrains police from initiating coercive action against IAF wing commander