City
Epaper

Lakhimpur Kheri case: SC to hear plea seeking bail cancellation of Ashish Mishra on Tuesday

By ANI | Updated: March 11, 2022 11:45 IST

The Supreme Court on Friday said the plea seeking bail cancellation of Ashish Mishra, who is the son of Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Ajay Mishra Teni and an accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri incident, will be heard on Tuesday.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Friday said the plea seeking bail cancellation of Ashish Mishra, who is the son of Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Ajay Mishra Teni and an accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri incident, will be heard on Tuesday.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India NV Ramana listed the matter to be heard on Tuesday.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioner, told the court that a witness in the Lakhimpur Kheri case was attacked last night and sought an urgent hearing. He also apprised the court that the matter was scheduled to be listed today. The bench said that it was an office mistake.

Family members of the victims of the Lakhimpur Kheri incident have moved the Supreme Court challenging the Allahabad High Court order, which granted bail to Ashish Mishra.

In the Special Leave Petition, family members of the deceased have challenged the Allahabad High Court order dated February 10, 2022, wherein Ashish Mishra was granted regular bail.

The petitioner said that Allahabad HC's order is unsustainable in law. They also said that they have approached the Apex Court as the State of Uttar Pradesh has failed to prefer any appeal against the impugned order.

"The lack of any discussion in the High Court's order as regards the settled principles for grant of bail is on account of lack of any substantive submissions to this effect by the State as the accused wields substantial influence over the State government as his father is a Union Minister from the same political party that rules the State," the petition stated.

"The impugned order is unsustainable in eyes of law as there has been no meaningful and effective assistance by the State to the court in the matter contrary to the object of the first Proviso to Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which provides that in grave offences notice of bail application should ordinarily be given to the Public Prosecutor," the petitioner said.

"Even the victims were prevented from bringing the relevant material as regards the settled principles for grant of bail to notice of High Court as their counsel 'got' disconnected from the hearing on January 18 this year before he could barely make any submissions and repeated calls to the court staff to get reconnected were to no avail and application filed by the victims/petitioners," the petition said.

"Contrary to settled law, the High Court failed to form its opinion on the basis of the charge sheet on broad probabilities and has instead gone on the basis of far-fetched imaginary possibilities," the petition said.

"The observation of the High Court said that there might be a possibility that the driver tried to speed up the vehicle to save himself, on account of which, the incident had taken place, is perverse especially when there was nothing on record to show the same and there is evidence in fact in the charge sheet to the contrary showing that the vehicles had been dashing at high speeds of 70-100 km/hr from the time they left the venue of the 'dangal'; when they passed the petrol pump; when they crossed the police crossing; all the way to the scene of the crime; and the same has been attested to by various eyewitnesses including police officials on duty," the petition added.

Further, the petitioner said that Allahabad High Court has not considered the heinous nature of the crime, the character of the overwhelming evidence against the accused in the charge sheet, position and status of the accused with reference to the victim and witnesses; the likelihood of the accused fleeing from justice and repeating the offence, and the possibility of his tampering with the witnesses and obstructing the course of justice, while granting relief to the accused.

Ashish Mishra was released from jail last week followed by Allahabad High Court granting him bail. Eight people, including four farmers, had died in violence on October 3, 2020, in Lakhimpur Kheri.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Ajay Kumar MishraAshish mishraindiaAllahabad High CourtSupreme CourtLakhimpur KheriIndiUk-indiaRepublic of indiaThe allahabad high courtIndia indiaGia india
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiViral Sighting of Tesla Cybertruck Near Mumbai Stirs EV Enthusiasm (Photos)

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

NationalPM Narendra Modi Discusses Tech and Innovation Collaboration With Elon Musk

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

National Realted Stories

NationalPoster controversy: Police disperse protestors in Jaipur, say situation under control

NationalGujarat: Vadodara woman duped of Rs 5.61 lakh in visa scam, complaint filed

NationalRetaliatory actions against Pak reflect India’s strong policy against those promoting terror: Raksha Khadse

NationalMP: CM holds meeting on law and order, identified 228 Pak citizens to leave nation by Sunday

NationalRoad rage case: K’taka HC restrains police from initiating coercive action against IAF wing commander