City
Epaper

Mathura court defers hearing in Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi case to Dec 10

By ANI | Updated: November 18, 2020 15:25 IST

The hearing of the civil suit filed in Mathura court seeking ownership of the entire 13.37 acres of Krishna Janmabhoomi land has been adjourned till December 10 after the plaintiff in the case Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust failed to appear before the court on Wednesday.

Open in App

The hearing of the civil suit filed in Mathura court seeking ownership of the entire 13.37 acres of Krishna Janmabhoomi land has been adjourned till December 10 after the plaintiff in the case Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust failed to appear before the court on Wednesday.

The Mathura court on October 16 had admitted the plea seeking to remove the mosque, situated adjacent to Krishna Janmabhoomi. The hearing for the same was scheduled for today.

On September 30, a Mathura civil court had refused to admit a suit to remove an Idgah "built on Krishna Janmabhoomi".

The court of the civil judge had dismissed the suit, filed by advocate Vishnu Jain, citing a bar under the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991. The Act had only exempted the litigation on the ownership of the disputed Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land in Ayodhya but barred the courts from entertaining litigation that would alter the status quo of a religious place as existed on August 15, 1947.

The suit blamed Mughal ruler Aurangzeb for demolishing a Krishna temple, built at the "birthplace of Lord Shree Krishna at Katra Keshav Dev, Mathura, in the year 1669-70 AD" and raising the "Idgah Mosque" in its place.

The suit sought the removal of encroachment and the superstructure, now maintained by the Committee of Management of Trust Masjid Idgah with the consent of the Sunni central board.The suit was filed against the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board and the Committee of Management Trust Masjid Idgah as it granted approval to the later to enter into an "illegal" compromise with Shree Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sangh on October 12, 1968. It was illegal and void for the reason that the society had no right over the property involved in Civil Suit No. 43 of 1967, decided by Civil Judge, Mathura, it said, adding that the 1968 deed was not binding.

The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act declares that the religious character of a place of worship shall continue to be the same as it was on August 15, 1947. The Act also declared that all suits, appeals, or any other proceedings regarding converting the character of a place of worship, which were pending before any court or authority on August 15, 1947, would abate as soon as the law came into force.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentSachin Tendulkar’s daughter Sara recalls being carried by him despite his fractured arm

NationalK'taka BJP slams Kharge for not identifying Pahalgam attack victims as Hindus

InternationalUS Embassy reminds citizens of 'Do Not Travel' advisory for J-K after Pahalgam attack

NationalOwaisi urges PM to invite all parties to all-party meeting on Pahalgam

NationalKerala Shocker: Man Murdered By Brother in Drunken Brawl in Thrissur

National Realted Stories

NationalTelangana CM, ministers pay homage to victims of Pahalgam terror attack

NationalTears, tributes and anguish: Jaipur bids farewell to Neeraj Udhwani killed in Pahalgam attack

National'Father shot before my eyes', daughter recounts horror of Pahalgam massacre

NationalCalcutta HC observes 2-minute silence to pay homage to Pahalgam attack victims

NationalMassive crackdown on Maoists on Chhattisgarh-Telangana border, three killed