City
Epaper

NGT gives Rajasthan authorities last chance to comply with order on preventing discharge of untreated effluents

By ANI | Updated: June 12, 2021 23:40 IST

The National Green Tribunal has warned and given the Rajasthan Authorities the last opportunity for compliance with an order on the prevention of discharge of untreated sewage and industrial effluents on the agriculture lands at village Nokha in Bikaner district.

Open in App

The National Green Tribunal has warned and given the Rajasthan Authorities the last opportunity for compliance with an order on the prevention of discharge of untreated sewage and industrial effluents on the agriculture lands at village Nokha in Bikaner district.

The tribunal, headed by chairperson, Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel, in an order passed on June 10, pulled up Rajasthan officials for non-compliance of order dated August 24, 2020.

"We give last opportunity for compliance, failing which, the Secretary of the concerned Departments i.e. Local Bodies, Urban Development, Local Self Department and the Member Secretary, State Pollution Control Board (PCB) will be held personally accountable, by way of coercive measures laid down under Section 25 and 26 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (NGT Act), " the tribunal said.

The tribunal noted that Under Section 26 of the NGT Act, violation of the order of this Tribunal is a criminal offence, and is punishable with imprisonment up to three years, and a fine up to Rs. 10 crores.

Under Section 25 of the NGT Act, 2010, the order is executable at the decree of the Civil Court. Under Section 51 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, there is a provision for civil imprisonment or any other order; any other order can include stopping of salary of the erring officers.

The Tribunal has made it clear that it will accordingly take such coercive measures as found appropriate if the failure continued.

After taking note of failing in compliance with its earlier order, the Tribunal said, "Let the Member Secretary State PCB and concerned Secretary Local Self Govt. Rajasthan remain present in person by video conferencing with the compliance status on next date of hearing, September 21".

"In view of the binding judgment of the Supreme Court, the plea of budget cannot be taken to justify the continued violation of the Water Act and citizen's right to clean environment. In absence of any other source of funds, funds are to be raised from the citizens in the area as directed by the Supreme Court, and for failure, concerned erring officers are to be proceeded against," the tribunal said.

NGT had earlier had sought a factual and action report from the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board with reference to the allegation of discharge of untreated sewage and industrial effluents on the agriculture lands at village Nokha of Bikaner district, Rajasthan.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Urban DevelopmentNational Green TribunalAdarsh Kumar Goel
Open in App

Related Stories

Navi MumbaiPanvel: PMC Installs 290 Solar-Powered Lights Across Key Public Locations for Sustainability

Navi MumbaiNavi Mumbai: RTI Exposes CIDCO’s Delay in Restoring DPS Flamingo Lake

Navi MumbaiNGT Slaps Rs 10,000 Fine on TTD for Delay in Responding to Environmental Concerns in Ulwe Temple Case

Navi MumbaiNavi Mumbai: NGT Issues Notice to MIDC Over Environmentalist's Plea to Protect Green Patch with 200 Trees

ThaneThane News: Environment Activists Sound Alarm Over Illegal Stone Quarrying Near Skyscrapers

National Realted Stories

NationalFitch Ratings sees Adani Ports' acquisition of NQXT as positive step for global diversification

NationalPahalgam attack: Governors, ministers bid farewell to Ramachandran in Kerala

NationalIndia sends medical aid worth $2 mn to Nepal for patients with thalassemia, sickle cell disease

NationalSacred thread row: K'taka BJP moves NHRC against 'unlawful', 'discriminatory' practices

NationalBengal recruitment case: A section of ‘tainted’ candidates got salaries without joining