City
Epaper

PIL in SC challenges National Commission for Minorities Act

By IANS | Updated: June 4, 2022 12:25 IST

New Delhi, June 4 A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has moved the Supreme Court challenging the validity of ...

Open in App

New Delhi, June 4 A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has moved the Supreme Court challenging the validity of Section 2 (C) of the National Commission for Minorities (NCM) Act, 1992 terming it 'arbitrary' and 'contrary' to the Constitution.

Petitioner Devkinandan Thakur Ji, filed through Advocate Ashutosh Dubey, also sought directions from the Centre to define 'minority' and lay down a guidelines for identification of minorities at district level in order to ensure that only those religious and linguistic groups, which are socially economically politically non-dominant and numerically very inferior, get the benefits and protections guaranteed under Articles 29-30.

"Hindus are merely 1 per cent in Ladakh, 2.75 per cent in Mizoram, 2.77 per cent in Lakshdweep, 4 per cent in Kashmir, 8.74 per cent in Nagaland, 11.52 per cent in Meghalaya, 29 per cent in Arunachal Pradesh, 38.49 per cent in Punjab and 41.29 per cent in Manipur but the Central government has not declared them 'minority' under Section 2(c) of the NCM Act and Section 2 (f) of the NCMEI Act, thus Hindus are not protected under Articles 29-30 and cannot establish-administer educational institution of their choice," the PIL contended.

It further stated that the Act using unbridled power under S. 2(c), the Centre arbitrarily notified five communities Muslims, Christ, Sikhs, Buddhists and Parsi as minority at national level.

Cause of action continues till date because followers of Judaism, Bahaism and Hinduism, who are real minorities in Ladakh, Mizoram, Lakshdweep, Kashmir, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Punjab, Manipur, cannot establish and administer educational institutions of their choice because of non-identification of 'minority' at state level, thus jeopardising their basic rights guaranteed under Article 29-30, the PIL claimed.

Their right under Articles 29-30 is being siphoned off illegally to the majority community in the state because the Centre has not notified them as 'minority' under NCM Act.

Followers of Judaism, Bahaism and Hinduism are being deprived of their basic rights to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.

"On the other hand, Muslims are in majority in Lakshdweep (96.58 per cent) and Kashmir (96 per cent) and there is significant population in Ladhakh (44 per cent), Assam (34.20 per cent), Bengal (27.5 per cent), Kerala (26.60 per cent), Uttar Pradesh (19.30 per cent) and Bihar (18 per cent); can establish & administer educational institutions of their choice. Christ are a majority in Nagaland (88.10 per cent), Mizoram (87.16 per cent) and Meghalaya (74.59 per cent), and there is significant population in Arunachal, Goa, Kerala, Manipur, Tamil Nadu & West Bengal, can also establish and administer," it read.

Likewise, Sikhs are a majority in Punjab and there is large population in Delhi, Chandigarh, Haryana, but they can establish and administer.

Similarly, Buddists are majority in Ladakh but they can establish and administer educational institutions of their choice, the PIL added.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtPublic Interest LitigationSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill

NationalKrishna Janmabhoomi Dispute: Supreme Court to Hear Plea on ASI, Center Involvement In Shahi Eidgah Case April 8

National Realted Stories

NationalJNUSU Election Result 2025: Left Alliance Retains Control, ABVP Makes Significant Gains

NationalFive Bangladeshi nationals pushed back for illegal infiltration: Assam CM

National‘Not just half an hour, but Pakistan is half a century behind India’: Owaisi

NationalWords of PM Modi resonate with spirit of seva and nation-building: Tripura CM Saha

National19 people arrested for ‘pro-Pakistan’ stand: Assam CM