City
Epaper

Pilibhit 'fake' encounter: HC sentences 43 cops for 7 years, says police should have put up accused for trial

By ANI | Updated: December 16, 2022 14:45 IST

In a major development in the Pilbhit encounter case, the Allahabad High Court convicted all 43 policemen involved in ...

Open in App

In a major development in the Pilbhit encounter case, the Allahabad High Court convicted all 43 policemen involved in the case. The High Court sentenced all the culprits to 7 years of rigorous imprisonment under IPC 304 with a fine of Rs 10,000, setting off a trial court's ruling of life imprisonment for the appellants.

The case pertains to the killings of 10 Sikhs for their alleged involvement in Khalistani activities.

The court of Justice Ramesh Singh and Justice Saroj Yadav sentenced all 43 policemen of the Uttar Pradesh Police involved in the fake encounter.

On the intervening night of 12-13 July 1991, three incidents at three different places i.e. Neoria, Bilsanda, and Puranpur, in District Pilibhit took place between the alleged Sikh terrorists and the police of district Pilibhit, in which ten alleged militants were killed. In this regard, cumulatively 13 FIRs were lodged in police station Neoria, Bilsanda and Puranpur of district Pilibhit.

"The trial Court believed on coming to the conclusion that ten Sikh youths were killed in a fake encounter after being kidnapped from the pilgrims' bus by the police personnel/appellants," read the trial court's order.

The judgement from the High Court stressed that the alleged terrorists could have been arrested and put to trial.

"It is not the duty of the police officers to kill the accused merely because he/she is a dreaded criminal. Undoubtedly, the police have to arrest the accused and put them up for a trial," the court noted.

The court also highlighted that the said case did fall under 304 IPC ie culpable homicide.

"No doubt, appellants exceeded the powers given to them by law, and they caused the death of the deceased by doing an act which they, in good faith, believed to be lawful and necessary for the due discharge of their duty. In such circumstances, the offence that was committed by the appellants, was culpable homicide not amounting to murder punishable under Section 304 of I.P.C," the court added.

The 2016 order of the Trial Court was challenged by all the appellants in the High Court Lucknow Bench, on which today the High Court convicted all the accused and sentenced them to 7 years of imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10,000.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: High CourtAllahabad High CourtRamesh SinghHong kong high courtSaroj yadavThe allahabad high courtAllahabad highKenyan high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalCan Mother-in-Law File Case Against Daughter-in-Law Under Domestic Violence Act? Here’s What Allahabad High Court Rules

NationalOdisha: High Court Grants Divorce Over Wife’s Mental Harassment and Suicide Threats

MumbaiBombay HC Upholds Divorce Over Spouse’s Suicide & Imprisonment Threats

NationalMarriage Does Not Grant Husband Ownership Over His Wife: Allahabad HC Refuses to Quash Case Against Man for Sharing Intimate Video

NationalJustice Yashwant Verma Transfer: Allahabad High Court Bar Association Stages Protest, Calls for Indefinite Strike

National Realted Stories

NationalPresident Droupadi Murmu to visit Vatican City for Pope Francis's funeral

NationalHelipad to be built at city bus terminal in Gurugram

NationalInfant dies after accidentally drinking chemical in Gurugram village

National'Terrorists behind Pahalgam massacre will not be spared', says Bengal BJP chief

NationalHindu Pakistani nationals holding long term visas exempted from visa revocation