City
Epaper

Relatives of deceased in Malegaon 2008 case write to Mukul Rohatgi not to appear for Lt Colonel Purohit

By ANI | Updated: January 6, 2021 19:55 IST

The relatives of the deceased in the Malegaon 2008 bomb blast case objected to the appearance of Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi who appeared for accused Lt Colonel Purohit.

Open in App

The relatives of the deceased in the Malegaon 2008 bomb blast case objected to the appearance of Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi who appeared for accused Lt Colonel Purohit.

Father, mother, wife and brother of six diseased sent letter to Mukul Rohatgi to not appear for accused as earlier he appeared against him as Attorney General of India.

Pursuant to the letter, Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi did not appear citing the reason, Advocate Neela informed the division bench that because of the letter, Mukul is not appearing for Colonel Purohit in this matter. The matter has been posted to 2nd February 2021.

The letter from the relatives to Rohatgi read, "I write to you with great hope that in order to prevent the miscarriage of justice, you will not appear on behalf of the accused number 9 Colonel Purohit in Criminal Writ petition 1726 of 2020 pending for hearing in the Bombay High Court."

"In the explosion of 29 September, 2008 at Malegaon all of us lost our loved sons. The Courts remain our last hope of receiving justice against the cowardly acts which not only created havoc in our lives but also claimed the lives of our loved ones," it read.

"The reason for writing this letter is as follows, You have appeared for the Union of India and the National Investigating Agency in Criminal Writ petition no 157 of 2015 on 21.09.2015. Further in 2016 while probing the bomb blast, the NIA asked the law ministry to seek your opinion in your capacity as the then-Attorney General regarding the applicability of Maharashtra Control of Orgzed Crime Act against petitioner Lt Col. Prasad Purohit and others," the letter read.

"Under these circumstances, we are of the opinion that your appearance on behalf of the accused number 9 will be in conflict of interest and will create prejudice to the whole proceedings," it read.

"In order to preserve the value of fair trial and uphold the sanctity of the position that you once held as Attorney general of India, we request you to not appear for the accused number 9," the letter added.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Virendra Prasad PurohitindiamalegaonBombay High CourtUnion Of IndiaMukul RohatgiJustice of bombay high courtBombay highIndiUk-indiaRepublic of india
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalPM Narendra Modi Discusses Tech and Innovation Collaboration With Elon Musk

MaharashtraDevendra Fadnavis Summoned by HC in Petition Challenging His 2024 Maharashtra Assembly Poll Win

MumbaiKunal Kamra Controversy: Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection from Arrest to Comedian in Case Over 'Gaddar' Joke

MumbaiBombay HC on Child Adoption: Parents of Two Disabled Children Can Adopt Third Child

Navi MumbaiNavi Mumbai Parking Policy in Final Stage, Proposal to Be Sent for State Govt Approval

National Realted Stories

NationalPahalgam Attackers Were in Direct Contact With Pakistan-Based Handlers: Indian Intelligence Agencies

NationalPahalgam Terrorist Attack: ‘I Am Alive, My Namesake Was Killed’ Says Sangli Juice Seller Who Escaped the Spot by an Hour

NationalCentre fast-tracks 17 mega infra projects worth Rs 14,096 crore across 4 states

NationalKillers who ask about religion can’t be Muslims: Abu Azmi on 'targeted attacks' in Pahalgam

NationalA. Jayathilak named new Chief Secretary of Kerala