City
Epaper

Resignation is democratic right: Karnataka Speaker to SC

By IANS | Updated: September 25, 2019 19:50 IST

In an opinion contrary to his predecessor over disqualification of rebel MLAs, the Karnataka Assembly Speaker told the Supreme Court on Wednesday that resignation is a democratic right and legal provision does not say that one is disqualified if he or she gives up membership of the House.

Open in App

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta representing Karnataka Assembly Speaker Vishweshwar Hegde Kageri told a bench headed by Justice N.V. Ramana that he is not taking sides on plea of 17 disqualified MLAs nor his predecessor but requested the court to lay down guidelines for the Speaker to deal with such a situation.

Citing a top court judgement, Mehta told the bench that legal provision does not say if you give up membership of House, you are disqualified.

"You can be disqualified by giving up membership of a political party. It is right of individual to step down and go back to people," Karnataka Assembly Speaker said opining that members can be disqualified, if they leave a political party.

Mehta said that the issue here is related to relationship between electorate and elected representatives and therefore opined that right to resign has to be recognised.

However, Mehta said that he did not want to be critical of whatever happened in this case but it may happen very frequently and issue needs to be adjudicated by the court.

These opinions came while hearing the disqualified MLAs' plea pleading that they should be allowed to contest bypolls scheduled on October 21.

The court has posted the matter for Thursday for further arguments and Congress and JD-S would respond to plea of disqualified MLAs.

Appearing for the rebel MLAs, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi told the court that former Speaker K.R. Ramesh was custodian of House and not of any political party.

He requested the court to suspend or defer by-elections. He also requested the court to stay the order that disqualify the MLAs as the legislators did not want to go to ask for votes with the tag that they have been disqualified.

Senior advocate C.A. Sundram, who was representing disqualified MLA Sudhakar said that dissenting voice is a basis of democracy and members cannot act like sheep to follow the rest.

Sundram told the court that it is not a sin to leave a party and resignation does not mean that he has defected and not left the party.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Tushar MehtahouseMukul Rohatgi
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSupreme Court Directs Yogi Adityanath Government to Pay ₹25 Lakh Compensation for Illegal Demolition Of House

HealthIndia’s Average Household Food Spending Falls Below 50% for First Time: Govt Report

NationalMUDA Scam: Congress Leaders Protest Against Governor Gehlot Raising Slogans, Banners, and Placards

TechnologyMumbai Ranks 2nd, Delhi 3rd Globally for Prime Property Price Rise in April-June 2024

NationalKolkata Doctor Rape-Murder Case: Solicitor General Tushar Mehta Objects to Kapil Sibal's Laughter During Hearing; Video Goes Viral

National Realted Stories

NationalJNUSU Election Result 2025: Left Alliance Retains Control, ABVP Makes Significant Gains

NationalFive Bangladeshi nationals pushed back for illegal infiltration: Assam CM

National‘Not just half an hour, but Pakistan is half a century behind India’: Owaisi

NationalWords of PM Modi resonate with spirit of seva and nation-building: Tripura CM Saha

National19 people arrested for ‘pro-Pakistan’ stand: Assam CM