City
Epaper

Saradha scam: Court questions ED’s 3rd supplementary charge sheet naming Nalini Chidambaram

By IANS | Updated: July 5, 2024 18:10 IST

Kolkata, July 5 The ED on Friday submitted its third supplementary charge sheet in the Saradha chit fund ...

Open in App

Kolkata, July 5 The ED on Friday submitted its third supplementary charge sheet in the Saradha chit fund case in West Bengal, naming Nalini Chidambaram there.

Nalini Chidambaram is the wife of Congress Rajya Sabha member and former Union Finance Minister, P Chidambaram.

However, the special court has not accepted the charge sheet as yet, raising some technical questions regarding the inclusion of Nalini Chidambaram’s name.

The court observed that cognisance in the matter would be established only after the central agency furnishes more substantiating documents on this count to it.

Sources said that the ED counsel, on Friday afternoon submitted a 1,100-page compiled document at the special court of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in Kolkata, which included the main charge sheet of 65 pages.

Sources said the central agency has claimed that Nalini Chidambaram received Rs 1.5 crore from Saradha Group’s founder chairman Sudipta Sen.

The ED has further claimed, that although Nalini Chidambaram has said that she received the money as legal consultancy fee as a tax consultant, she could not furnish any supporting documents for that.

However, after the charge sheet was submitted the judge of the special court raised some technical questions on inclusion of Nalini Chidambaram’s name, besides questioning the central agency on why the third supplementary charge sheet was submitted after 11 years.

On the inclusion of Nalini Chidambaram’s name, the special court questioned how a tax consultant is considered involved in corruption charges if he or she accepts consultancy fees as a professional from a client.

The court also questioned whether any advocate taking the brief on behalf of a person accused of a crime could be considered as a partner in crime.

Finally, the judge observed that he will take cognisance in the matter only if the central agency submits more substantiating proof in the matter to the satisfaction of the court.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalProtests continue in Sindh against Pak govt's Indus River canal project

InternationalUnder patronage of UAE President, Abdullah bin Zayed inaugurates 34th Abu Dhabi International Book Fair

InternationalPalestine President Mahmoud Abbas appoints Hussein al-Sheikh as PLO deputy

InternationalAt least 14 people killed, 750 others injured in explosion at key Iranian port

InternationalIndian Embassy in Nepal holds condolence meeting for J-K attack victims

National Realted Stories

NationalPoster controversy: Police disperse protestors in Jaipur, say situation under control

NationalGujarat: Vadodara woman duped of Rs 5.61 lakh in visa scam, complaint filed

NationalRetaliatory actions against Pak reflect India’s strong policy against those promoting terror: Raksha Khadse

NationalMP: CM holds meeting on law and order, identified 228 Pak citizens to leave nation by Sunday

NationalRoad rage case: K’taka HC restrains police from initiating coercive action against IAF wing commander