City
Epaper

SC adjourns hearing on Bombay HC's reduced working hours in view of COVID-19

By ANI | Updated: January 27, 2022 15:50 IST

The Supreme Court on Thursday adjourned a hearing on a plea challenging circular issued by the Bombay High Court reducing its working hours to three hours a day in view of COVID-19.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Thursday adjourned a hearing on a plea challenging circular issued by the Bombay High Court reducing its working hours to three hours a day in view of COVID-19.

A bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud listed the matter for February 4 for hearing.

The plea filed by activist Ghanshyam Upadhyay stated that due to the Standard Operating Procedure(SOP), the principal bench of the High Court has been "functioning only for namesake" causing hardships to the litigants and advocates.

According to the SOP issued on January 10, 2022, the High Court will function from 12 noon-3 pm without a lunch break from Monday to Friday starting from January 11 to 28.

It stated that courts can be made functional through a virtual hearing without reducing the working hours.

The plea said that the fundamental rights of citizens are being jeopardised and violated and it was a matter of great concern and public importance.

"The reason seems to reduce the risk for all concerned being infected with new variants, however, it has been forgotten that if all the courts are made functional for three hours in a day, then also such risk is enviable," it added.

The plea while seeking direction to the Bombay High court to form guidelines and ensure the virtual functioning of all courts in the State also said that virtual hearings can increase the disposal rate of cases and are the future of court proceedings.

According to the plea, another SOP has directed that from January 3, subordinate courts in Mumbai, Pune, Raigad and Alibaug to function between 11 am and 4 pm with 50 per cent of staff on rotation and to hear remand, bail and urgent matters through physical hearing.

The matters for recording evidence and hearing arguments were directed to be taken through a virtual platform.

The plea claimed that there are no requisite infrastructures in these courts for hearing matters through the virtual platform.

It sought directions to all courts in the State to function full time through the virtual platform by laying down guidelines without curtailing the court working hours.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtBombay High CourtDy ChandrachudGhanshyam upadhyay
Open in App

Related Stories

Navi MumbaiNavi Mumbai: ‘Dog Mafia’ Slur Lands Seawoods Resident in Jail; Bombay HC Orders 7‑Day Term for Contempt

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

MaharashtraDevendra Fadnavis Summoned by HC in Petition Challenging His 2024 Maharashtra Assembly Poll Win

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

National Realted Stories

NationalIndia leverages water resources as strategic tool to tighten noose around 'rogue state' Pakistan

NationalIndian Citizens With Valid Visas Denied Entry Into Pakistan at Attari-Wagah Border; Video Goes Viral

NationalIndia’s ethanol drive boosts farmers' income, saves Rs 1.26 lakh cr in forex: Hardeep Puri

NationalDelhi HC defers hearing on plea challenging halting of issuance of EWS certificates

NationalPahalgam attack: BJP legislators in Bengal stage protest, burn Pakistan flags in front of Assembly