City
Epaper

SC closes contempt proceedings against Ramdev & Balkrishna, accepts apology

By IANS | Updated: August 13, 2024 12:30 IST

New Delhi, Aug 13 The Supreme Court on Tuesday discharged the contempt notice issued to Yoga Guru Baba ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 13 The Supreme Court on Tuesday discharged the contempt notice issued to Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev and Patanjali Ayurved's Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna over the continued publication of misleading advertisements by the company.

Earlier on May 14, dispensing Ramdev and Balkrishna’s personal appearance in further hearings, a bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah reserved its verdict in the contempt proceedings.

Justice Kohli-led Bench decided to close the matter in view of the apology tendered before the apex court and the public apology published by Patanjali. However, it cautioned them not to violate the undertaking furnished before the apex court in future.

In an earlier hearing, the top court had rejected the "unconditional and unqualified apology" tendered by Ramdev and Balkrishna and took strong exception over the violation of the undertaking given to the Supreme Court in November last year.

Patanjali had earlier assured the Supreme Court that it would not make any casual statements claiming the medicinal efficacy of its products or advertise or brand them in violation of law and would not release any statement against any system of medicine to the media in any form.

The Indian Medical Association (IMA) has sought action against Patanjali for violation of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 -- which prohibits the advertisement of certain products for the treatment of specified diseases and disorders, including diabetes, heart diseases, high or low blood pressure and obesity.

Last week, the top court told IMA President Dr R.V. Asokan to issue a public apology in prominent newspapers using his own funds for his contemptuous statement.

In an interview with a media outlet, Dr Asokan had termed the oral observations made by the apex court during Patanjali's misleading advertisements case against allopathy practitioners as "unfortunate" and a "very vague and general statement which has demoralised the doctors".

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessQ3 CPI inflation expected at 0.4 pc: BoB report

NationalRajasthan CM’s birthday coincides with two years of BJP govt in desert state

National'Unacceptable': BJP's Shashank Mani slams objectionable slogans against PM Modi at Cong rally

BusinessMH99 Burgers Redefines India's Fast-Food Scene with Bold Flavors, Family Roots, and a Game-Changing Franchise Model

EntertainmentAahana Kumra celebrates 14 years of 'Sir Sir Sarla', calls theatre her truest joy

National Realted Stories

NationalAll things will be there, says Shivakumar on meeting Rahul, Sonia Gandhi

NationalDense fog blankets parts of Rajasthan; visibility drops in many areas

NationalTN 2026 Assembly polls: AIADMK begins distribution of application forms for aspirants

NationalUproar in Rajya Sabha as JP Nadda demands Sonia Gandhi’s apology over Cong rally slogans

NationalEAM Jaishankar to co-chair India–UAE Joint Commission in Abu Dhabi, visit Israel next