City
Epaper

SC Collegium recommends CJ of Patna HC be made apex court judge

By IANS | Updated: January 7, 2025 21:25 IST

New Delhi, Jan 7 The Supreme Court Collegium on Tuesday recommended the name of Patna High Court's Chief ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 7 The Supreme Court Collegium on Tuesday recommended the name of Patna High Court's Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran for elevation as a judge of the apex court.

"While recommending his name, the Collegium has taken into consideration the fact that there is no representation on the Bench of the Supreme Court from the High Court of Kerala," said a statement released by SC Collegium.

Justice K. Vinod Chandran was appointed as a judge of the Kerala High Court in November 2011 and was elevated as the Chief Justice of the Patna High Court on March 29, 2023.

"He has served as a Judge of the High Court for more than 11 years and as a Chief Justice of a big High Court for more than a year. During his long tenure as a Judge and Chief Justice of the High Court, Mr Justice Chandran has acquired significant experience in diverse fields of law,” the SC Collegium said.

In its meeting, the apex court Collegium deliberated on and discussed the names of Chief Justices and senior puisne judges of the High Courts eligible for appointment to the Supreme Court.

Born on April 25, 1963, Justice Chandran stands at serial no. 13 in the combined all-India seniority of High Court Judges.

He obtained a law degree from Thiruvananthapuram’s Kerala Law Academy Law College and started practice in 1991. Before elevation, he served as Special Government Pleader (Taxes) of the Kerala government from 2007 to 2011.

Presently, the committee comprising the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court, commonly called the Collegium, sends the recommendation for the appointment of a judge to the apex court as per the 1993 Second Judges Case. The Collegium basically decides who will be appointed as a judge to the Supreme Court or a High Court.

As per convention, the government is obliged to accept the Collegium's recommendation if the decision has been reiterated.

In 2015, a five-judge Constitution Bench struck down the Centre’s idea of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) to replace the Collegium system. Article 124(2) of the Constitution provides that "every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose".

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalNorth Korea denounces Japan PM's offering to war shrine

InternationalIran port explosion: Death toll rises to 8, over 750 injured

InternationalTwo Israeli soldiers killed in Gaza

InternationalIranian FM voices satisfaction with 'process, pace' of indirect talks with US

InternationalTaiwan detects Chinese military activity near its territory

National Realted Stories

NationalNo justification for such acts of terror: Iranian Prez condemns J&K attack in phone call with PM Modi

NationalPoster controversy: Police disperse protestors in Jaipur, say situation under control

NationalGujarat: Vadodara woman duped of Rs 5.61 lakh in visa scam, complaint filed

NationalRetaliatory actions against Pak reflect India’s strong policy against those promoting terror: Raksha Khadse

NationalMP: CM holds meeting on law and order, identified 228 Pak citizens to leave nation by Sunday