City
Epaper

SC dissolves bench over Vijay Madanlal Choudhary ruling on ED Powers

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: November 23, 2023 16:39 IST

On Thursday, the Supreme Court disbanded the panel formed to review a set of applications seeking a reevaluation of ...

Open in App

On Thursday, the Supreme Court disbanded the panel formed to review a set of applications seeking a reevaluation of its Vijay Madanlal Choudhary decision, which affirmed the authority of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED).

Following the Union Government's request for an extension, the special bench, consisting of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, and Bela M Trivedi, opted to postpone the hearing due to Justice Kaul's impending retirement next month. The bench has urged the Chief Justice of India to form a new bench to address the issue. The next scheduled hearing will take place in two months.

The Special Bench commenced the hearing yesterday to challenge the interpretation of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, as per the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary judgment. This ruling, issued in July 2022, affirmed the constitutional validity of various provisions within the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, including those related to arrest, seizure, presumption of innocence, and the imposition of stringent bail conditions.

According to a report of LiveLaw, Responding to Solicitor General’s request for the hearing to be deferred, Justice Kaul, alluding to his imminent retirement (on December 15), said, The problem is that I am on a deadline. I will not be able to take the burden. I have a few things to wind up before demitting office. Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta, however, insisted on being granted an adjournment, saying, “A very selective reading has been done. If Your Lordships are not taken through the entirety of the act and its purpose, you may not get sufficient assistance.

He also pointed out that a coordinate bench will have to record some reasons for referring the the decision to a larger bench. Justice Trivedi also expressed similar views, saying, We have to express some views before referring this because the larger bench must have two views before it. Otherwise, it'll be very easy to refer matters. There have to be reasons. And my impression is, there’s a judgment on this, Live Law reported.

Tags: Supreme CourtDirectorate Of Enforcement
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill

NationalKrishna Janmabhoomi Dispute: Supreme Court to Hear Plea on ASI, Center Involvement In Shahi Eidgah Case April 8

National Realted Stories

NationalWe must stand united to defeat terrorism once & forever, says Rahul Gandhi in J&K

NationalChhattisgarh: 51 People, Including 37 Children, Suffer From Food Poisoning After Eating at a Wedding

NationalIdentify Pakistani nationals and send them back: Home Minister tells Chief Ministers

NationalMP: Unidentified object from sky falls on house, police summons Airforce experts

NationalKerala HC refuses bail to five juveniles accused of murdering Class 10 student