City
Epaper

SC grants interim protection from arrest to man accused of raping minor

By IANS | Updated: January 1, 2023 17:00 IST

New Delhi, Jan 1 The Supreme Court has granted protection from arrest to an accused facing allegations of ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 1 The Supreme Court has granted protection from arrest to an accused facing allegations of raping a minor girl.

A bench comprising justices A.S. Bopanna and Dipankar Datta said: "Issue notice to the respondent. In the meantime, there shall be interim protection against arrest of the petitioner subject to the petitioner diligently participating in the investigation and complying with the requirements of Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973."

The FIR was registered under 366(A) and 376 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 alleging that the accused owns and works in a clothing shop adjacent to that of complainant's, and in April and June 2021, after learning that the victim was alone in her house, the accused entered the house and allegedly raped her, on the pretext of false assurance of marriage.

Appearing for the accused, advocate Namit Saxena argued that the FIR is completely false and added that the records reflect that the accused, a public servant then, was at the government office on both dates of the alleged crime.

Saxena further submitted that the progress report filed by the investigating officer had found that no offence was made out.

After hearing arguments, the top court issued notice to the Bihar government and also granted interim protection from arrest to the petitioner.

The petitioner moved the apex court against Patna High Court order passed in November 2022.

The plea contended that the high court without looking into the facts and circumstances of the case and without considering that nothing could be found against the petitioner, which might indicate his guilt, dismissed his anticipatory bail application.

"That the case at hand is an unfortunate one where the petitioner, a government servant at the relevant time, has been roped into a conspiracy of committing rape upon the victim by the complainant/father of victim and his family, and now he has an apprehension that he shall be arrested by the police, despite his non-involvement in the alleged crime as mentioned in the FIR," said the plea.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: JanuaryNamit saxenaSupreme CourtDipankar dattaSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court levelCanadian supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill

NationalKrishna Janmabhoomi Dispute: Supreme Court to Hear Plea on ASI, Center Involvement In Shahi Eidgah Case April 8

National Realted Stories

NationalTourists who return to Mumbai thank Centre, Maharashtra govt after Pahalgam terror attack

NationalPresident Droupadi Murmu to visit Vatican City for Pope Francis's funeral

NationalHelipad to be built at city bus terminal in Gurugram

NationalInfant dies after accidentally drinking chemical in Gurugram village

National'Terrorists behind Pahalgam massacre will not be spared', says Bengal BJP chief