City
Epaper

SC says any attempt of bogus voting, booth capturing should be dealt with iron hands

By ANI | Updated: July 23, 2021 22:25 IST

The Supreme Court on Friday said that any attempt of booth capturing or bogus voting should be dealt with iron hands as it ultimately affects the rule of law and democracy.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Friday said that any attempt of booth capturing or bogus voting should be dealt with iron hands as it ultimately affects the rule of law and democracy.

A bench of Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice MR Shah, referring to its earlier verdicts, said that the freedom to vote is a part of the freedom of expression and the secrecy of the vote is necessary for strengthening democracy.

The apex court said the essence of the electoral system should be to ensure freedom to voters to exercise their free choice.

The court dismissed an appeal by a man convicted for rioting at a poll booth in Jharkhand.

"The essence of the electoral system should be to ensure freedom of voters to exercise their free choice. Therefore, any attempt of booth capturing or bogus voting should be dealt with iron hands because it ultimately affects rule of law and democracy," the court said.

It said in elections to the Lok Sabha and state legislatures maintenance of secrecy is a must.

It added that in democracies where direct elections take place it is important to ensure that voter casts his vote without fear.

"Democracy and free elections are part of the basic structure of the Constitution. An election is a mechanism that ultimately represents the will of the people. Nobody can be permitted to dilute the right to free and fair elections," the Bench said referring its earlier verdict.

The accused in the case had allegedly formed an unlawful assembly "to snatch the voters' list and to cast bogus voting" and attacked some political workers during an election. The apex court said the use of force even by one member of the assembly amounts to rioting.

Accused Lakshman Singh had filed an appeal in the top court challenging the High Court order that confirmed the trial court's six-month punishment to him under sections 323 (voluntary causing hurt) and 147 (rioting) of the Indian Penal Code.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: High CourtMr ShahSupreme CourtDy ChandrachudHong kong high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

NationalCan Mother-in-Law File Case Against Daughter-in-Law Under Domestic Violence Act? Here’s What Allahabad High Court Rules

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill

National Realted Stories

NationalMaoists request security forces for dialogue amid intensified anti-LWE action

NationalOmar Abdullah sends ministers across country to ensure safety of J&K residents

NationalThree Chennai college students drown at TN's Azhiyar Dam

NationalPahalgam terror attack: Hooda seeks adequate relief, job for Navy officer's family

NationalNHRC condemns Pahalgam attack, ‘deeply disturbed’ by killings of innocent civilians