City
Epaper

SC upholds Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2020

By IANS | Updated: April 8, 2022 15:15 IST

New Delhi, April 8 The Supreme Court on Friday affirmed the validity of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment ...

Open in App

New Delhi, April 8 The Supreme Court on Friday affirmed the validity of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment (FCRA) Act, 2020, which imposes new conditions on the receipt and use of funds by NGOs.

A bench headed by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar upheld the 2020 amendments made to the FCRA Act, 2010. The detailed judgment in the case will be uploaded on the top court website later in the day.

The Centre had told the Supreme Court that there exists no fundamental right to receive unbridled foreign contributions without any regulation, while defending the amendments made in 2020 to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act.

The MHA emphasized that FCRA aim was to ensure foreign contribution does not adversely impinge upon the functioning of parliamentary institutions, political associations, and academic, and other voluntary organisations as well as individuals in India.

The petitioners had challenged the amendments, which included newly added sections 12 and 17, which state that the foreign contributions must be deposited in the FCRA account created in the specified branch of the scheduled bank, which was later notified as State Bank of India, New Delhi branch.

The petitioners claimed the amendments were arbitrary and stringent, which made the functioning of NGOs extremely difficult.

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) in a 355-page affidavit filed in the Supreme Court, said Parliament has enacted the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, laying down a clear legislative policy of strict controls over foreign contributions for certain activities in the country.

The MHA said the "legislation has also prohibited acceptance and utilisation of foreign contribution or foreign hospitality for any activities detrimental to the national interest and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto". The affidavit was settled by Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, who was assisted by advocate Kanu Agrawal.

Petitioners in the matter were Noel Harper and Nigel Mills of Share and Care Foundation in Andhra Pradesh and Joseph Lizy and Annamma Joachim of National Workers Welfare Trust in Telangana.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Kanu agrawalNoel harperindiaNew DelhiMHASupreme CourtThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westIndiUk-indiaRepublic of indiaIndia india
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSexually Explicit Content on OTT, Social Media: Supreme Court Issues Notice to Centre

MaharashtraOver 10,000 Pakistani Nationals Traced in Maharashtra and Delhi Post-Palgham Terror Attack

MumbaiViral Sighting of Tesla Cybertruck Near Mumbai Stirs EV Enthusiasm (Photos)

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

National Realted Stories

NationalIndia's changemakers speak: Padma awardees reflect on recognition and responsibility

NationalBSF arrests 4 B'deshi smugglers along Indo-Bangla border; seizes contraband

NationalRS by-election: BJP's Satyanarayana to be NDA candidate from Andhra Pradesh

NationalGovt targets 100 GW of nuclear power capacity by 2047 to boost energy security

National'Insult to Hindu sentiments: Raj BJP chief slams Kharge