City
Epaper

Supreme Court Overrules 2004 Verdict Says Sub-Classification of SC-ST Permissible

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: August 1, 2024 11:31 IST

The Supreme Court on Thursday, August 1, overruled its 2004 verdict by a five-judge bench in EV Chinnaiah vs ...

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Thursday, August 1, overruled its 2004 verdict by a five-judge bench in EV Chinnaiah vs State of Andhra Pradesh, which stated that sub-classification was impermissible on the grounds that SC/STs constitute homogenous classes.

A bench comprising seven judges of the apex court has ruled by majority that sub-classification within the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SC/STs) is permissible.

CJI DY Chandrachud said there are six opinions. He stated, "The majority of us have overruled EV Chinnaiah and we hold sub-classification is permitted." Justice Bela Trivedi dissented.

CJI further stated that at the lowest levels, the struggles faced by the class do not disappear with their representation. "The holding of Chinnaiah that sub-classification of the scheduled classes is impermissible is overruled," he added.

Justice BR Gavai noted that there are categories within the SC/STs which have faced oppression for centuries. He emphasized that the state must evolve a policy to identify the creamy layer among the SC/ST category and exclude them from the fold of affirmative reservation.

In her dissenting judgment, Justice Bela M. Trivedi disagreed with the majority. She asserted that in the absence of executive or legislative power, the states do not have any competence to sub-classify the castes and sub-classify the benefits reserved for all of the Scheduled Castes.

"Sub-classification by states would amount to tinkering with the Presidential notification under Article 341(2)," she further added.

Tags: Supreme CourtScStReservationDy Chandrachud
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill

MumbaiMumbai: Tea Vendor at Railway Office Ran Fake VIP Quota Racket, Earned Up to Rs 2 Lakh/Month

National Realted Stories

NationalPahalgam terror attack: Indus Waters Treaty kept at abeyance, India informs Pak

NationalGujarat: Vadodara Police intensify security checks after Pahalgam terror attack

NationalBengal recruitment scam case: Parallel protests by both 'genuine' and 'tainted' candidates start

NationalOne killed, another missing as truck carrying liquor overturns in MP

NationalDelhi court turns down Tahawwur Rana's plea to interact with family