City
Epaper

Agreement for adoption of unborn child is adoption for money: K'taka HC

By IANS | Updated: December 9, 2022 23:55 IST

Bengaluru, Dec 9 Opining that an 'agreement for adoption' of an unborn child is unknown to law and ...

Open in App

Bengaluru, Dec 9 Opining that an 'agreement for adoption' of an unborn child is unknown to law and terming it as 'adoption for money', the Karnataka High Court has dismissed a joint plea filed by both, the biological and adoptive parents of a 2 years and nine months old girl child.

The Hindu biological parents and the Muslim adoptive parents had approached the High Court after their plea seeking custody of the child from a child care unit had been turned down by the Udupi district court.

A division bench comprising Justice B. Veerappa and Justice K.S. Hemalekha observed that the right to life of an unborn shall also be considered as one falling within the scope of Article 21 of the Constitution, and upheld the Udupi District Child Protection Unit's (DCPU) move to register a criminal case against both, the adoptive as well as the biological parents. The DCPU had contended that the child was exchanged illegally for in return for money.

The court also ruled the 'agreement' as invalid even under the Mohammedan law, since the 'agreement' was entered between Muslim and non-Muslim parents.

Noting that the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 can protect the welfare of a child whose parents are unable to take care of their children due to financial constraints, the High Court bench stated that the 'agreement' cannot be sustained.

While the child was born on March 26, 2020, the two couples had signed the 'unregistered agreement for adoption' on March 21, 2020.

They had entered into the agreement as the biological parents were too poor to care for their unborn child.

Thereafter, the adoptive parents, who are childless had brought up the child as their own. However, the child's custody was handed over to a child care unit by the DCPU who had lodged a complaint in 2021.

The adoptive parents, supported by the biological parents had then moved the district court seeking the child's custody along with a plea to declare them as guard of the minor child. However, their plea was rejected by the district court.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: High CourtKarnataka High CourtHong kong high courtKenyan high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalCan Mother-in-Law File Case Against Daughter-in-Law Under Domestic Violence Act? Here’s What Allahabad High Court Rules

NationalOdisha: High Court Grants Divorce Over Wife’s Mental Harassment and Suicide Threats

MumbaiBombay HC Upholds Divorce Over Spouse’s Suicide & Imprisonment Threats

NationalHC Directs Centre to Decide on Renaming India to Bharat or Hindustan

NationalMP HC Sides with Husband in Marital Dispute, Says Spouses Must Maintain Respect in Conversations

Politics Realted Stories

Maharashtra'Unity Not Just for Elections': MNS Leader Sandeep Deshpande on Possible Thackeray Alliance

PoliticsMurshidabad Violence: Shehzad Poonawalla Slams Yusuf Pathan Over Tea Post, Says, “As Hindus Get Slaughtered…”

PoliticsTamil Nadu Assembly Elections 2026: BJP-AIADMK Join Hands, Palaniswami To Lead Alliance, Says Amit Shah

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill

NationalParliament Passes Waqf Amendment Bill: Two JDU Leaders Resign Over Party's Support