New Delhi, March 7 The Delhi High Court on Monday turned down the plea of former West Bengal Chief Secretary Alapan Bandyopadhyay challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Principal Bench order to transfer his case concerning disciplinary proceedings initiated by the Centre, from West Bengal to the national capital.
While pronouncing the order, a division bench of Chief Justice D.N. Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh, refused to interfere in the order issued by the tribunal.
Earlier on February 25, after hearing the submissions of parties in the matter, the bench had reserved the order.
The former civil servant Bandyopadhyay came into the limelight when he skipped a meeting chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Kolkata in the wake of cyclone Yaas in May last year.
During the last hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, pointed out the violation of the former CS, saying that the CAT has exclusive power for transferring the case.
Prior to that, Bandyopadhyay's counsel submitted that the CAT order was passed in complete violation of the principles of natural justice, equity, and fair play. The petitioner further submitted he was not even granted a right to file his written objections to the Transfer Petition.
Bandyopadhyay was issued a showcause notice under the Disaster Management Act following the incident. The bureaucrat, however, resigned from service but was subjected to disciplinary proceedings initiated by the Centre.
He then approached the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in Kolkata against these proceedings. Following this, the CAT's Principal Bench in Delhi transferred the case to the national capital.
Bandyopadhyay then moved the High Court against CAT, New Delhi order. The High court on October 29, took strong objection to the manner in which the CAT Principal Bench favoured the Central government in transferring Bandyopadhyay's case to itself and quashed CAT's order. Thereafter, the Centre approached the apex court against the High Court order.
The apex court said that the Calcutta High Court did not have the jurisdiction to decide the plea of Bandyopadhyay. It also granted liberty to Bandyopadhyay to approach the jurisdictional High Court (Delhi) to challenge the order of the CAT Principal.
Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor