City
Epaper

EWS quota not eroding reservation for SCs, STs and OBCs, Centre to SC

By IANS | Updated: September 20, 2022 22:25 IST

New Delhi, Sep 20 The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the economically weaker sections (EWS) ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Sep 20 The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the economically weaker sections (EWS) have been given 10 per cent quota in admissions and jobs out of 50 per cent general category seats without eroding the reservation for SCs, STs, and OBCs.

Attorney General K.K. Venugopal, representing the Centre, submitted before a five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice U.U. Lalit that SCs and STs have been given benefits by way of affirmative actions reservation in promotion in government jobs, legislature, panchayat and municipalities and the EWS quota does not violate the basic structure of the Constitution, as he defended the 103rd constitutional amendment which provides for 10 per cent quota to the EWS.

He added that the EWS quota has been given without disturbing the 50 per cent quota, which is meant for the socially and economically backward classes (SEBC).

The bench - also comprising Justices Dinesh Maheshwari, S. Ravindra Bhat, Bela M. Trivedi and J.B. Pardiwala was hearings on the cases challenging the constitutional validity of the EWS quota.

The AG added that backward classes including the SCs, STs, and OBCs each contained economically weaker sections within themselves, and also the general category consisted of economically weaker sections, which were grossly poor. He contended that SCs, STs and OBCs quota is self-contained sections of backwardness and the EWS quota is separate.

Therefore, through the amendment, the state provided affirmative actions to such economically weaker sections which did not get benefits under the existing reservations, he said.

Venugopal argued that among the general category there is a section which is grossly poor, that is, the economically weaker section.

He said EWS quota has been given this for the first time, while SCs and STs are concerned, they have been loaded with the benefits through affirmative actions. Venugopal further added that the general category, having a large population, and perhaps more meritorious, would be disadvantaged of the opportunities in educational institutions and jobs.

The bench queried him on data on EWS in the general category. Venugopal replied that 18.2 per cent in the general category belonged to EWS, and as far as numbers are concerned, it would be about 350 million of the population.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: AgSupreme CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill

NationalKrishna Janmabhoomi Dispute: Supreme Court to Hear Plea on ASI, Center Involvement In Shahi Eidgah Case April 8

Politics Realted Stories

Maharashtra'Unity Not Just for Elections': MNS Leader Sandeep Deshpande on Possible Thackeray Alliance

PoliticsMurshidabad Violence: Shehzad Poonawalla Slams Yusuf Pathan Over Tea Post, Says, “As Hindus Get Slaughtered…”

PoliticsTamil Nadu Assembly Elections 2026: BJP-AIADMK Join Hands, Palaniswami To Lead Alliance, Says Amit Shah

NationalParliament Passes Waqf Amendment Bill: Two JDU Leaders Resign Over Party's Support

MaharashtraLMOTY 2025: Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Shares BIG Update on Shifting to Varsha Bungalow