City
Epaper

'Manifestly arbitrary and irrational': Plea in SC challenges HC order on exchange of Rs 2,000 banknotes

By IANS | Updated: May 31, 2023 21:55 IST

New Delhi, May 31 A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court's ...

Open in App

New Delhi, May 31 A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court's May 29 judgement allowing exchange of Rs 2,000 currency notes without any identification.

The plea, filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, said: "Petitioner submits that while passing the Judgment, the High Court has failed to appreciate that the RBI Notification dated 19.5.2023... and the SBI Notification dated 20.5.2023, which permits exchange of Rs 2,000 banknotes without even obtaining any requisition slip and identity proof, is manifestly arbitrary and irrational and therefore violates Articles 14 (right to equality)."

It submitted that the RBI admits in the notification that total value of Rs 2000 banknotes in circulation have declined from Rs 6.73 lakh crore to Rs 3.62 lakh crore.

"Petitioner submits that this Rs 3.11 lakh crore has reached individuals' locker and the rest has otherwise been hoarded by the gangsters, kidnappers, contract killers, illegal arms suppliers, money launderers, drug smugglers, hootch peddlers, human traffickers, gold smugglers, black marketeers, spurious medicine manufacturers, tax evaders, cheaters, looters, separatists, terrorists, Maoists, Naxals, mining mafias, land mafias, satta mafias and corrupt government employees, public servants and politic," added the plea.

The high court on Monday dismissed a plea challenging the RBI and SBI notifications, that permits exchange of the withdrawn Rs 2,000 notes without any identity proof.

A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad noted that in order to ensure that there is a smooth transition of Rs 2,000 denomination banknotes, which continue to be a legal tender till September, 2023 i.e. for four months, banks have provided facilities for conversion of these banknotes to other denominations, therefore, the present case is not the case of demonetisation but withdrawal of Rs 2,000 denomination banknotes from circulation.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Ashwini kumar upadhyaySatish chandra sharmaDelhi High CourtUs Supreme CourtJudge Of The Supreme CourtSupreme CourtThe Supreme CourtBench Of The Supreme CourtUnited States Supreme CourtMaldives Supreme CourtWay Supreme CourtRetired Supreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

NationalRCB Approaches Delhi High Court Against Uber Over Advertisement Featuring Travis Head

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill

Politics Realted Stories

Maharashtra'Unity Not Just for Elections': MNS Leader Sandeep Deshpande on Possible Thackeray Alliance

PoliticsMurshidabad Violence: Shehzad Poonawalla Slams Yusuf Pathan Over Tea Post, Says, “As Hindus Get Slaughtered…”

PoliticsTamil Nadu Assembly Elections 2026: BJP-AIADMK Join Hands, Palaniswami To Lead Alliance, Says Amit Shah

NationalParliament Passes Waqf Amendment Bill: Two JDU Leaders Resign Over Party's Support

MaharashtraLMOTY 2025: Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Shares BIG Update on Shifting to Varsha Bungalow